Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this paper is to highlight some concerns about the partly inaccurate manner in which the currently available2‐of‐2and2‐of‐3simple and improved runs‐rules charts based on the sign and the signed‐rank statistics were designed using Markov chain matrix. Because of the memory‐less property of the Markov chains, the empirical average run‐length (ARL) values were not affected; but the design structure of the matrix makes it difficult to formulate the general expressions of theARLexplicitly. Also, the dimension (and consequently, the simplicity) of the transition probability matrices (TPMs) and the false alarm rates expressions were affected negatively. Thus, we present some zero‐ and steady‐state formulae that make it easier to construct some key elements of the run‐length distribution (including the TPMs) of the simple and improved 2‐of‐(H+ 1) runs‐rules charts based on the sign and the signed‐rank statistics, for any positive integer valueH> 0, not justH= 1 and 2, as currently available for these monitoring schemes, so that any interested reader may use these formulae to obtain the corresponding empirical study.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.