Abstract

Unfortunately, only a small percent of pathological gamblers seek the professional help they need. In the current study, we test the idea that individual differences in reward sensitivity should predict whether a pathological gambler has sought treatment—the odds of treatment seeking should decrease as reward sensitivity increases. This hypothesis rests on the proposition that reward sensitive pathological gamblers should find treatment seeking aversive because doing so would remove a route to reward. We also tested those motivations to gamble that are positively reinforcing (social affliction and self-enhancement) as a possible mechanism by which reward sensitivity undermines treatment seeking—we did not anticipate negatively reinforcing motivations (e.g., coping) to be a mechanistic variable. Ninety-two pathological gamblers completed a large-scale survey that contained the variables of interest. As predicted, pathological gamblers were less likely to have sought treatment as reward sensitivity increased. Moreover, this relationship was mediated by social affiliation motivations to gamble, but not self-enhancement or coping motives. Reward sensitive gamblers did not wish to seek treatment to the extent that they were motivated to gamble for the social interactions it provides—seeking treatment would cut this avenue of affiliation with others. In light of these results, we suggest health care professionals take reward sensitivity into account when trying to promote treatment seeking, to say nothing of the social affiliation motives that underlie the reward sensitivity-treatment seeking link.

Highlights

  • Only a small percent of pathological gamblers seek the professional help they need

  • We test the idea that individual differences in reward sensitivity should predict whether a pathological gambler has sought treatment—the odds of treatment seeking should decrease as reward sensitivity increases

  • We test the idea that reward sensitivity undermines treatment seeking among pathological gamblers to the extent that they are motivated to gamble due to self-enhancement or social affiliation needs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Only a small percent of pathological gamblers seek the professional help they need. We test the idea that individual differences in reward sensitivity should predict whether a pathological gambler has sought treatment—the odds of treatment seeking should decrease as reward sensitivity increases. Pathological gamblers were less likely to have sought treatment as reward sensitivity increased This relationship was mediated by social affiliation motivations to gamble, but not self-enhancement or coping motives. We test the idea that pathological gamblers who are reward sensitive may be especially reluctant to seek treatment We base this on the contention that their attraction to reward might overpower the need for professional assistance. We test the idea that reward sensitivity undermines treatment seeking among pathological gamblers to the extent that they are motivated to gamble due to self-enhancement or social affiliation needs. Gamblers often need to seek professorial care (Nathan 2003)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.