ON AN ALLEGED DEFINITIVE INTERPRETATION OF PROSLOGION 2–4: A DISCUSSION OF G. SCHUFREIDER'S AN INTRODUCTION TO ANSELM'S ARGUMENT

Abstract

The Southern Journal of PhilosophyVolume 19, Issue 1 p. 129-139 ON AN ALLEGED DEFINITIVE INTERPRETATION OF PROSLOGION 2–4: A DISCUSSION OF G. SCHUFREIDER'S AN INTRODUCTION TO ANSELM'S ARGUMENT Jasper Hopkins, Jasper Hopkins University of Minnesota Jasper Hopkins (Ph. D., Harvard) is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota. His two most recent books (1981) are Nicholas of Cusa on Learned Ignorance: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Docta Ignorantia and Nicholas of Cusa's Debate with John Wenck: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Ignota Litterature and Apologia Doctae Ignorantiae.Search for more papers by this author Jasper Hopkins, Jasper Hopkins University of Minnesota Jasper Hopkins (Ph. D., Harvard) is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota. His two most recent books (1981) are Nicholas of Cusa on Learned Ignorance: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Docta Ignorantia and Nicholas of Cusa's Debate with John Wenck: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Ignota Litterature and Apologia Doctae Ignorantiae.Search for more papers by this author First published: Spring 1981 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1981.tb01417.xCitations: 1 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume19, Issue1Spring 1981Pages 129-139 RelatedInformation