Abstract

A set of quasi-uniform random variables $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ may be generated from a finite group $G$ and $n$ of its subgroups, with the corresponding entropic vector depending on the subgroup structure of $G$.It is known that the set of entropic vectors obtained by considering arbitrary finite groups is much richer than the one provided just by abelian groups. In this paper, we start to investigate in more detail different families of non-abelian groups with respect to the entropic vectors they yield. In particular, we address the question of whether a given non-abelian group $G$ and some fixed subgroups $G_1,\ldots,G_n$ end up giving the same entropic vector as some abelian group $A$ with subgroups $A_1,\ldots,A_n$, in which case we say that$(A, A_1, \ldots, A_n)$ represents $(G, G_1, \ldots, G_n)$. If for any choice of subgroups $G_1,\ldots,G_n$, there exists some abelian group $A$ which represents $G$, we refer to $G$ as being abelian (group) representable for $n$. We completely characterize dihedral, quasi-dihedral and dicyclic groups with respect to their abelian representability, as well as the case when $n=2$, for which we show a group is abelian representable if and only if it is nilpotent. This problem is motivated by understanding non-linear coding strategies for network coding, and network information theory capacity regions.

Highlights

  • Let X1, . . . , Xn be a collection of n jointly distributed discrete random variables over some alphabet of size N

  • In this paper we propose a classification of finite groups with respect to the quasi-uniform variables induced by the subgroup structure

  • We study which finite groups belong to the same class as abelian groups with respect to this classification, that is, which finite groups can be represented by abelian groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Let X1, . . . , Xn be a collection of n jointly distributed discrete random variables over some alphabet of size N. Let G = QD−2k1 or QD+2k1 be a quasi-dihedral group of size 2k+1. all the subgroups of G are of the form (1) r2i = {ra : a ≡ 0 mod 2i}, 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1,. By Lemma 9 and the fact that dihedral groups are uniformly abelian group representable, the result follows. Ψ is a subgroup preserving bijection and since D2k is abelian group representable by Proposition 12, Lemma 9 implies that QD−2k1 and QD+2k1 are uniformly abelian group representable as well. Ψ is a subgroup preserving bijection and since by Proposition 12 the dihedral group D2k is abelian group representable, Lemma 9 implies that DiC2k−1 is uniformly abelian group representable as well. The results we have obtained on representability of 2-groups rely on the use of a subgroup preserving bijection ψ and Lemma 9.

Observing that
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.