Abstract
In their recent commentary in Protein Science, Jaskolski et al. analyzed three randomly picked diffraction data sets from fragment‐screening group depositions from the PDB and, based on that, they claimed that such data are principally problematic. We demonstrate here that if such data are treated properly, none of the proclaimed criticisms persist.
Full Text
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Published version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society
Paper Title
Journal
Date