Abstract

Methane, methanol and ethanol are three common high-octane alternative fuels. As fuels for high compression ratio engines, they can improve thermal efficiency while preventing knocking. However, each of these three fuels has its own physicochemical properties and presents different engine performance. This study compares in detail the performance, combustion and emissions of a high-compression-ratio SI engine fueled by methanol, ethanol and methanol. A 4-cylinder high compression ratio SI engine simulation model was built based on 1-D simulation platform. The engine was converted from a CI diesel engine with a CR of 17.5, and the methanol, ethanol of methane injector was installed in the intake port. The results showed that for the methanol, ethanol and methane fuels, under the same engine speeds and equivalence ratios, the BP and BT of methanol were higher than ethanol and methane fuels, methane has the lowest BP and BT; methane has a lower BSFC and BTE than methanol and ethanol, with methanol having the highest BSFC and BTE; the CO and NOx emissions of methanol were lower than ethanol and methane fuels; the HC and CO2 emissions of methane were lower than methanol and ethanol fuels.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.