Abstract
The paper presents review of the literature in terms of the advantages of no-touch great saphenous vein (GSV) harvesting technique and its impact on long-term GSV patency for coronary artery bypass grafting compared to conventional method of vein harvesting. Presented detailed pathophysiological mechanisms of venous graft failure, using conventional GSV harvesting.
 Purpose. Analysis of literature data for the optimal choice of additional vascular shunt used for coronary bypass grafting in multi – vessel coronary artery disease, based on patency rate.
 Conclusion. No-touch technique of GSV harvesting provides better structural, functional, and mechanical protection of the vein wall. Perfecting the technique of this harvesting method and long-term follow up in patients with no-touch GSV grafts may reveal a graft patency comparable to that of LITA.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
