Abstract

Recently published measurements of the branching ratios $\mathcal{B}(\ensuremath{\psi}(1S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{C}(1S))$ and $\mathcal{B}(\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{C}(1S))$ by the CLEO Collaboration are examined in the context of a potential model that includes both relativistic and one-loop QCD corrections to the quark-antiquark interaction. The prediction for the width $\ensuremath{\Gamma}(\ensuremath{\psi}(1S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{C}(1S))$ is in excellent agreement with the new data, but the prediction for $\ensuremath{\Gamma}(\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{C}(1S))$ is too small. In an effort to understand this discrepancy, we derive an upper bound on $\ensuremath{\Gamma}(\ensuremath{\psi}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{C}(1S))$ and point out its experimental value saturates this bound.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.