Abstract

To evaluate the normal maximal mural thickness (MMT) of the appendix in asymptomatic subjects and determine whether any significant difference in MMT exists between pediatric and adult populations. The MMT of 187 appendices in asymptomatic subjects was measured at sustained-compression ultrasonography (US). The measured MMTs were categorized into three groups according to patient age (39 young children [including infants] aged 1-6 years, 79 older children and adolescents aged 7-15 years, 69 adolescents and adults aged 16-82 years), and the relationships between categoric variables were analyzed by using analysis of variance and the parametric Scheffé test. The mean MMTs in the young children, older children and adolescent, and adolescent and adult groups were 1.9 mm +/- 0.4 (SD), 2.0 mm +/- 0.5, and 2.1 mm +/- 0.5, respectively. The corresponding ranges of normal MMT were 1.1-2.8, 1.0-2.8, and 1.2-3.0 mm, respectively. No significant difference in normal appendix MMT was observed between the young children group and the older children and adolescent group (P =.2) or between the older children and adolescent group and the adolescent and adult group (P =.639). The difference in MMT between the young children group and the adolescent and adult group was marginally significant (P =.042). Although adoption of age-related MMT criteria does not seem warranted because it would necessitate measurement precision below 0.5 mm, which is not possible to achieve consistently in daily practice, data indicate that in children aged 6 years or younger, an appendiceal mural thickness of less than 3 mm should be regarded as normal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.