Abstract

CMS has recently reported a moderate excess in the $\mu\nu jj$ final state in a second generation Leptoquark search, but they have disregarded it because the excess is not present in the $\mu\mu jj$ final state and because they do not observe the expected resonant peak in the distributions. As a proof of concept we show that a simple Leptoquark model including second and third generation couplings with non-negligible single- and non-resonant production in addition to usual pair production could explain the data: excess ($\mu\nu jj$), lack of excess ($\mu\mu jj$) and missing peak in the distributions; while being in agreement with collider constraints. We take this result and analysis as a starting point of a reconsideration of the ATLAS and CMS second generation Leptoquark searches. We also discuss which would be the consequences and modifications that should be performed in the searches to test if this deviation would correspond to a New Physics signal. We observe that low-energy flavor constraints can be avoided by adding heavier particles to the model.

Highlights

  • Since the Higgs boson discovery in 2012 [1,2,3], practically all experimental high energy physics results have stuck to the Standard Model (SM) predictions

  • B-physics results by BABAR [18,19], Belle [9], and LHCb [4,5,8] indicate a possible presence of leptoquark new physics (NP), this is all at the level of a low-energy effective

  • We first discuss on the agreement between the model and the data: we begin by considering how our results could be affected if we perform a more detailed simulation, we study how our model assumptions can be modified and what differences does this alteration inflict upon the analysis and results, we discuss why the hypothesis of electric charge Q 1⁄4 1=3 is favored over a leptoquark with Q 1⁄4 2=3, and we examine the reported deficit in the μμjj final state and possible explanations in case that corresponds to a NP effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the Higgs boson discovery in 2012 [1,2,3], practically all experimental high energy physics results have stuck to the Standard Model (SM) predictions. After a broad variety of new physics (NP) models [12,13,14,15,16] attempting to explain these anomalies while not being ruled out by all other experimental results, leptoquarks seem to be the explanation that best accommodates data [6,16,17]. B-physics results by BABAR [18,19], Belle [9], and LHCb [4,5,8] indicate a possible presence of leptoquark NP, this is all at the level of a low-energy effective

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.