Abstract

Background: Non-invasive ventilation is safely used in the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, the factors associated with success are unclear. Objective: To compare the effects of BiPAP-S and AVAPS-S modes in patients with AHRF, as well as comparing the presence of obesity and body positioning during therapy on the outcomes. Methods: The prospective randomized study included 62 patients, (33 treated with BiPAP-S, 29 with AVAPS-S). The course of blood gas analysis and differences in measurements of ventilation were compared. Throughout the monitoring period, the patients treated in semi-recumbent and lateral positions at similar time periods, and the effect of changes in positioning was evaluated. Results: No difference was found in the course of PaCO2, pH, HCO3 levels, and length of hospital stay between both modes. There was a mean reduction of 5.7±4.1 mmHg in the PaCO2 levels with the AVAPS-S mode, and of 2.7±2.3 mmHg with the BiPAP-S mode per session (p<0.05). Presence of obesity didn9t make any change on the course of PaCO2 within both modes. No remarkable effect of body positioning was observed within both modes. Conclusion: Although the decrease in the PaCO2 levels with the AVAPS-S mode per session was remarkably high, the course was similar with both modes. Furthermore, obesity and body positioning had no prominent effect on the PaCO2 response and ventilator mechanics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.