Abstract

BackgroundPrenatal screening for chromosomal aneuploidies was initiated in the 1970s, based in maternal age. With the introduction of serum and ultrasound biomarkers, new screening methodologies, with higher detection rates and lower false-positive rates, were implemented. More recently, cell-free fetal DNA testing was presented as a non-invasive test that uses maternal plasma to obtain fetal DNA in order to search for fetal aneuploidies or other chromosomal imbalances. MethodologySearches of PubMed were performed, being restricted to English-language publications and to humans. The search period was from January 2010 to July 2016. A total of 3416 citations were examined by title and abstract, 159 were analyzed integrally and a backward search of relevant studies led to the analyses of an additional 67 articles. ResultsWhen compared to other prenatal screening methods of common aneuploidies, cell-free fetal DNA testing has the best performance. However, its high cost and failure rate prevent at present time its implementation as a universal prenatal aneuploidy screening. Recent inclusion of microdeletions and microduplications in the panel of chromosomal anomalies to be screened by cell-free fetal DNA testing is a matter of concern, because of the low positive predictive value for these changes, and the associated significant cumulative false-positive rate. DiscussionCell-free fetal DNA testing represents the best screening method for common aneuploidies, and should its cost decrease, its use may be more widespread. But presently, contingent screening strategies may represent a cost-effective alternative. This review provides a current overview of this relevant theme.

Highlights

  • Prenatal screening for chromosomal aneuploidies was initiated in the 1970s, based in maternal age

  • Recent inclusion of microdeletions and microduplications in the panel of chromosomal anomalies to be screened by cell-free fetal DNA testing is a matter of concern, because of the low positive predictive value for these changes, and the associated significant cumulative false-positive rate

  • Screening for fetal aneuploidies by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is more reliable than what is achieved by standard screening [42]

Read more

Summary

Results

When compared to other prenatal screening methods of common aneuploidies, cell-free fetal DNA testing has the best performance. Its high cost and failure rate prevent at present time its implementation as a universal prenatal aneuploidy screening. Recent inclusion of microdeletions and microduplications in the panel of chromosomal anomalies to be screened by cell-free fetal DNA testing is a matter of concern, because of the low positive predictive value for these changes, and the associated significant cumulative false-positive rate

Discussion
Amorim Costa
Prenatal screening evolution
NIPT vs standard screening
Limitations of cell-free fetal DNA testing
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.