Abstract

Background: There is a medical need for an easy, fast, and non-invasive method for metabolic syndrome (MetS) screening. This study aimed to assess the ability of FibroScan to detect MetS, in participants who underwent a self-paid health examination. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all adults who underwent a self-paid health examination comprising of an abdominal transient elastography inspection using FibroScan 502 Touch from March 2015 to February 2019. FibroScan can assess the level of liver fibrosis by using a liver stiffness score, and the level of liver steatosis by using the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) score. The logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve were applied to select significant predictors and assess their predictability. A final model that included all significant predictors that are found by univariate analysis, and a convenient model that excluded all invasive parameters were created. Results: Of 1983 participants, 13.6% had a physical status that fulfilled MetS criteria. The results showed that the CAP score solely could achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (0.76–0.82) in predicting MetS, and the AUC can be improved to 0.88 (0.85–0.90) in the final model. An AUC of 0.85 (0.83–0.88) in predicting MetS was obtained in the convenient model, which includes only 4 parameters (CAP score, gender, age, and BMI). A panel of predictability indices (the ranges of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio: 0.78–0.89, 0.66–0.82, 2.64–4.47, and 0.17–0.26) concerning gender- and BMI-specific CAP cut-off values (range: 191.65–564.95) were presented for practical reference. Conclusions: Two prediction systems were proposed for identifying individuals with a physical status that fulfilled the MetS criteria, and a panel of predictability indices was presented for practical reference. Both systems had moderate predictive performance. The findings suggested that FibroScan evaluation is appropriate as a first-line MetS screening; however, the variation in prediction performance of such systems among groups with varying metabolic derangements warrants further studies in the future.

Highlights

  • Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of disorders, including insulin resistance/hyperglycemia, visceral adiposity [identified by large waistline (WL) or being overweight], atherogenic dyslipidemia (e.g., raised triglycerides (TG) or reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL)), and endothelial dysfunction [1]

  • The conventional procedures for the confirmation of metabolic syndrome (MetS) have depended on blood assays, which largely lead to a resistive mentality toward the procedures and are nonconducive to long-term follow-up

  • This was a single center, retrospective cohort study to assess the ability of FibroScan to detect MetS in participants of a self-paid health examination at the Health Management Center (HMC) of Taipei Medical University Hospital (TMUH)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of disorders, including insulin resistance/hyperglycemia, visceral adiposity [identified by large waistline (WL) or being overweight], atherogenic dyslipidemia (e.g., raised triglycerides (TG) or reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL)), and endothelial dysfunction (characterized by elevated blood pressures) [1]. There is a medical need for an easy, fast, and non-invasive method for metabolic syndrome (MetS) screening. This study aimed to assess the ability of FibroScan to detect MetS, in participants who underwent a self-paid health examination. An AUC of 0.85 (0.83–0.88) in predicting MetS was obtained in the convenient model, which includes only 4 parameters (CAP score, gender, age, and BMI). Conclusions: Two prediction systems were proposed for identifying individuals with a physical status that fulfilled the MetS criteria, and a panel of predictability indices was presented for practical reference. The findings suggested that FibroScan evaluation is appropriate as a first-line MetS screening; the variation in prediction performance of such systems among groups with varying metabolic derangements warrants further studies in the future

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.