Abstract

SummaryNew model fusion techniques based on spatial‐random‐process modeling are developed in this work for combining multi‐fidelity data from simulations and experiments. Existing works in multi‐fidelity modeling generally assume a hierarchical structure in which the levels of fidelity of the simulation models can be clearly ranked. In contrast, we consider the nonhierarchical situation in which one wishes to incorporate multiple models whose levels of fidelity are unknown or cannot be differentiated (e.g., if the fidelity of the models changes over the input domain). We propose three new nonhierarchical multi‐model fusion approaches with different assumptions or structures regarding the relationships between the simulation models and physical observations. One approach models the true response as a weighted sum of the multiple simulation models and a single discrepancy function. The other two approaches model the true response as the sum of one simulation model and a corresponding discrepancy function, and differ in their assumptions regarding the statistical behavior of the discrepancy functions, such as independence with the true response or a common spatial correlation function. The proposed approaches are compared via numerical examples and a real engineering application. Furthermore, the effectiveness and relative merits of the different approaches are discussed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.