Abstract

Abstract The predictive performance of three low-Reynolds-number turbulence models, one based on the linear (Boussinesq) stress-strain relationship and two adopting cubic forms, is examined by reference to transitional flat-plate boundary layers subjected to streamwise pressure gradient and moderate free-stream turbulence, the latter causing bypass transition. One of the cubic models involves the solution of two transport equations, while the other involves three equations, one of which relates to the second invariant of turbulence anisotropy. The investigation demonstrates that, for the conditions examined, the non-linear models return a more credible representation of transition than the linear variant, although none of the models may be said to be entirely satisfactory. Thus, while non-linear modelling shows promise and offers inherent advantages through the use of a more general stress-strain linkage and elaborate calibration, further refinement is needed in the present cubic variants for transitional flows.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.