Non-governmental health planning: Is the Rochester approach an alternative to regulatory certificate of need?

Abstract

ObjectiveHealth planning is the process of identifying community needs for health care, facilities and technology and allocating resources to meet those needs to the exclusion of redundant capacity. Health planning in the United States was pioneered in Rochester, New York through private sector efforts but today, health planning is generally understood in the US as referring to a governmental function: “certificate of need” regulation. Yet health planning need not be, and indeed is not today, an exclusively governmental function. The original conception of a health planning agency as a civil society-based, non-governmental organization survives in Rochester. This study assesses the, viability of this private option as an alternative to regulation. MethodOutcomes of applications to a, non-governmental health planning entity in the Rochester region (CTAAB) were compared to, outcomes from the state agency (DOH) for two adjacent regions. ResultsThe non-governmental, approach to health planning appeared to be more restrictive, with the Rochester region spending less. There are numerous extraneous commas in the text as it appears on my screen. Are they part of the document? Iif so, they need to be removed. If they were not added to the document, the document does not look right in the Online Proofing application. Overall and in particular, utilizing less advanced imaging. ConclusionsThe Rochester NY region, appears to demonstrate that cooperative efforts by stakeholders can lower health care costs. For such, voluntary efforts to succeed, policymakers need not regulate—they can engage with community, leaders by convening them to analyze local utilization patterns, review options for chartering or, subsidizing non-governmental organizations to implement planning, and delineate safe harbors from, antitrust or other potential liability arising from collective action