Abstract

We study non-clairvoyant scheduling to minimize weighted flow time on two different multi-processor models. In the first model, processors are all identical and jobs can possibly be speeded up by running on several processors in parallel. Under the non-clairvoyant model, the online scheduler has no information about the actual job size and degree of speed-up due to parallelism, yet it has to determine dynamically when and how many processors to run the jobs. The literature contains several O(1)-competitive algorithms for this problem under the unit-weight multi-processor setting (Edmonds, Theor. Comput. Sci. 235(1), 109---141, 2000; Edmonds and Pruhs, in Proceedings of ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 685---692, 2009) as well as the weighted single-processor setting (Bansal and Dhamdhere, ACM Trans. Algorithms 3(4), 2007). This paper shows the first O(1)-competitive algorithm for weighted flow time in the multi-processor setting. In the second model, we consider processors with different functionalities and only processors of the same functionality can work on the same job in parallel. Here a job is modeled as a sequence of non-clairvoyant demands of different functionalities. This model is derived naturally from the classical job shop scheduling; but as far as we know, there is no previous work on scheduling to minimize flow time. In this paper we take a first step to study non-clairvoyant scheduling on this multi-processor model. Motivated by the literature on 2-machine job shop scheduling, we focus on the special case when processors are divided into two types of functionalities, and we show a non-clairvoyant algorithm that is O(1)-competitive for weighted flow time.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.