Abstract

864 Vol 350 • September 20, 1997 recommended to be reapplied frequently throughout the day therefore the daily amount used in practice is likely to exceed 2 mg/cm. Over the period of application only 1–2% of sunscreen in the applied product was absorbed, therefore the sunscreen content of the topical product was relatively unchanged over the period of application. It is likely that given the apparent small depletion of sunscreen in the applied formulation on the skin, a similar amount would have been absorbed if a product application density of 2 mg/cm had been used. However, had there been substantial depletion of sunscreen in the product (ie, greater than 10%) over the period of application the density of product applied to the skin would have been critical. Our results suggest that sunscreens should not be the sole method of sun protection. It would be prudent not to apply oxybenzone to large surface areas of skin for extended and repeated periods of time, unless no alternative protection is available. There may be an additional concern for young children who have less well-developed processes of elimination, and have a larger surface area per body weight than adults, with respect to systemic availability of a topically applied dose.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.