Abstract

BackgroundEven though there are multiple studies documenting the outcome of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty as well as abundant studies on uncemented arthroplasties, there is a dearth of comparative studies of the uncemented acetabular component and a cemented component. In this study we aimed to document the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome as well as component survival in a randomized controlled trial.Materials and methodsTwo hundred fifteen patients (240 hips) were randomly allocated to receive a cemented Charnley cup or uncemented Duraloc 1200 cup. All patients received cemented Charnley stems and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 6 months, and 2, 5, and 10 years.ResultsHarris Hip Scores improved from 48.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0–51.6] to 90.2 [95% CI 87.9–92.6] in the Charnley group and from 49.3 [95% CI 86.9–91.3] in the Duraloc group at 6 months. After 10 years, the Charnley group’s Harris Hip Score was 89.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 87.0–92.6], and the Duraloc group’s score was 87.3 (95% CI 84.1–90.6). In the radiographic analysis after 10 years, there was no statistical difference in the prevalence of radiographic signs of loosening. Nine cups were revised in the Charnley group, and five cups were removed in the Duraloc group. The difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference between the cups when aseptic loosening was the end-point, nor in survival analyses.ConclusionsThere is no statistically significant difference in clinical or radiological outcome between the Charnley cup and the Duraloc after 10 years, and no difference in implant survival after 12–14 years. The uncemented Duraloc cup is as good as the cemented Charnley cup after 10 years.

Highlights

  • Hip arthroplasty is a highly successful procedure for alleviating pain and improving overall hip function in arthritis and other destructive hip joint conditions [1]

  • Background Even though there are multiple studies documenting the outcome of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty as well as abundant studies on uncemented arthroplasties, there is a dearth of comparative studies of the uncemented acetabular component and a cemented component

  • Harris Hip Scores improved from 48.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0–51.6] to 90.2 [95% CI 87.9– 92.6] in the Charnley group and from 49.3 [95% CI 86.9– 91.3] in the Duraloc group at 6 months

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hip arthroplasty is a highly successful procedure for alleviating pain and improving overall hip function in arthritis and other destructive hip joint conditions [1]. The cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component has been regarded as a gold standard, and multiple reports confirm survival of 85–92% after 16–25 years [4,5,6] and revision rates of 2–17% after 17–30 years [7,8,9,10] when aseptic loosening is the end-point. Multiple series have demonstrated low rates of revision when aseptic loosening is the end-point, but revision due to osteolysis and polyethylene wear remains a problem [12,13,14,15]. In a study of a first-generation porous-coated cup (PCA) with 15–17 years follow-up, 17% of the cups had been revised due to loosening with or without osteolysis [21], whereas a recent 20-year study found 96% survival of shell and 17% liner revision rate [15]. All patients received cemented Charnley stems and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 6 months, and 2, 5, and 10 years

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.