Abstract

Abstract Background Supplementation of corticosteroid, ascorbic acid and thiamine in adult septic patients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid and thiamine (HAT) in adult septic patients. Methods Data search included Pumbed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to Sep, 2021. Only studies with classifications of sepsis and intravenous HAT treatment were included. Adult patients with sepsis (aged ≥18 years) were divided into 2 groups. The treatment group received HAT therapy, whereas the control group received standard care and/or intravenous hydrocortisone. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Results Eleven studies including 4579 patients who fulfilled the predefined criteria were analyzed (6 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 5 clinical cohort studies). No hospital mortality reduction was demonstrated in patients treated with HAT when compared to the reference (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.27; I 2 = 39%) group. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score decrement at 72hours was more significant in HAT-treated patients (mean difference [MD]: –1.23; 95% CI: –1.94 to –0.53; I 2 = 81%). There was no difference in the duration of vasopressor use between HAT-treated patients and controls (MD: –4.92; 95% CI: –24.38 to 14.53; I 2 = 97%). Statistical heterogeneity was noted with no sign of significant publication bias. Conclusion In adult sepsis and septic shock patients, HAT treatment failed to reduce mortality or shorten vasopressor duration, but reduced SOFA scores.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.