NIVOPOSTOP (GORTEC 2018-01): A phase III randomized trial of adjuvant nivolumab added to radio-chemotherapy in patients with resected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma at high risk of relapse.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Agent Quizartinib (Q), a Potent and Selective FLT3 Inhibitor (FLT3i), in Patients (pts) with FLT3-Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3-ITD)-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Enrolled in the Global, Phase 3, Randomized Controlled Quantum-R Trial

LBA443 Background: The 2 primary endpoints of the CheckMate 274 trial were met as nivolumab (NIVO) improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo (PBO) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients with tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1%. We report extended follow-up data. Methods: CheckMate 274 is a phase 3, double-blind trial of adjuvant NIVO versus PBO for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) (bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis) after radical resection. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg every 2 wk or PBO for ≤ 1 year of treatment. Patients had pathologic evidence of UC at high risk of recurrence and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤ 1. Primary endpoints were DFS in ITT patients and in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. DFS was also analyzed in prespecified subgroups. Overall survival and non–urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS) in ITT patients and in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% were secondary endpoints. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety were exploratory endpoints. Results: There were 353 patients randomly assigned to NIVO (PD-L1 ≥ 1%, n = 140) and 356 to PBO (PD-L1 ≥ 1%, n = 142). With median follow-up of 36.1 months (minimum follow-up, 31.6 months), median DFS was 22.0 months with NIVO versus 10.9 months with PBO in ITT patients and 52.6 months with NIVO versus 8.4 months with PBO in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (Table). DFS benefit was seen in most subgroups analyzed including age, sex, ECOG PS, nodal status, prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and PD-L1 status. NUTRFS and DMFS benefits with NIVO versus PBO were also observed in both populations (Table). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18.2% and 7.2% of patients in the NIVO and PBO arms, consistent with the primary analysis. Overall survival will be assessed at a future database lock. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, NIVO continued to show DFS, NUTRFS, and DMFS benefits versus PBO. The hazard ratio (HR) for DFS and NUTRFS in PD-L1 ≥ 1% patients and for DMFS in both ITT and PD-L1 ≥ 1% patients also continued to improve versus the primary analysis. No new safety signals were identified. These results further support adjuvant NIVO as a standard of care for high-risk MIUC after radical resection. Clinical trial information: NCT02632409 . [Table: see text]

391 Background: The standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with MIUC is radical surgery ± cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo), but many pts are cisplatin-ineligible. There is no conclusive evidence supporting adjuvant chemo in pts who did not receive neoadjuvant chemo and in those with residual disease after neoadjuvant cisplatin. This phase 3 trial of adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) in pts with MIUC after radical surgery ± neoadjuvant cisplatin (CheckMate 274) aims to address an unmet need in these pts. We report the initial results. Methods: This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of NIVO vs PBO in pts with high-risk MIUC (bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis) after radical surgery. Pts were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg Q2W or PBO for ≤ 1 year of adjuvant treatment. Pts had radical surgery within 120 days ± neoadjuvant cisplatin or were ineligible/declined cisplatin-based chemo, evidence of UC at high risk of recurrence per pathologic staging, were disease-free by imaging, and ECOG PS ≤ 1. Primary endpoints: disease-free survival (DFS) in all randomized pts (ITT population) and in pts with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%. DFS was stratified by nodal status, prior neoadjuvant cisplatin, and PD-L1 status. Non–urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS) in ITT pts and in pts with PD-L ≥ 1% is a secondary endpoint. Safety is an exploratory endpoint. Results: In total, 353 pts were randomized to NIVO (PD-L1 ≥ 1%, n = 140) and 356 pts to PBO (PD-L1 ≥ 1%, n = 142). The primary endpoint of DFS was met in ITT pts (median follow-up, 20.9 mo for NIVO; 19.5 mo for PBO) and in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. DFS and NUTRFS were improved with NIVO vs PBO in both populations (Table). DFS improvement with NIVO was generally consistent across subgroups. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17.9% and 7.2% of pts in the NIVO and PBO arms, respectively. Conclusions: NIVO demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs PBO for MIUC after radical surgery, both in ITT pts and pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. AEs were manageable and consistent with previous reports. These results support adjuvant NIVO as a new SOC for pts with MIUC with high risk for recurrence despite neoadjuvant chemo or those ineligible for and/or declining cisplatin-based chemo. Clinical trial information: NCT02632409 . Research Sponsor: Bristol Myers Squibb[Table: see text]

Chemotherapy + PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Should Be the Preferred Option in the Neoadjuvant Therapy of NSCLC

<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Locoregional relapse in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is common, approaching 50% for some subsites despite multimodality therapy. Salvage surgery is the standard of care, but able to achieve durable control in only a minority of patients. While adjuvant radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy is offered to select patients, this approach can be prohibitively toxic. Given the activity and tolerability of programmed death-1 inhibitors in metastatic HNSCC, we investigated the safety and efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab after salvage surgical resection.</p>Patients and Methods:<p>This was an open-label, multi-institutional phase II clinical trial (NCT03355560). Patients with recurrent, resectable HNSCC were enrolled within 6 weeks of salvage surgery. Six 28-day cycles of adjuvant nivolumab were planned. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) more than 58%, based on an institutional historical control group of 71 patients with recurrent HNSCC who underwent salvage surgery.</p>Results:<p>Between February 2018 and February 2020, 39 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 22.1 months, 2-year DFS was 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 57.8–88.1] and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 73% (95% CI, 58–91.8). Three of 39 (8%) patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events and 3 of 39 (8%) discontinued treatment due to side effects. Ten of 39 had locoregional recurrence, while 2 of 10 also had synchronous metastatic disease. There was no difference in DFS between PD ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive and PD-L1–negative patients. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved DFS in patients with high tumor mutational burden (<i>P</i> = 0.083).</p>Conclusions:<p>Adjuvant nivolumab after salvage surgery in locally recurrent HNSCC is well tolerated and showed improved DFS compared with historical controls.</p></div>

<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Locoregional relapse in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is common, approaching 50% for some subsites despite multimodality therapy. Salvage surgery is the standard of care, but able to achieve durable control in only a minority of patients. While adjuvant radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy is offered to select patients, this approach can be prohibitively toxic. Given the activity and tolerability of programmed death-1 inhibitors in metastatic HNSCC, we investigated the safety and efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab after salvage surgical resection.</p>Patients and Methods:<p>This was an open-label, multi-institutional phase II clinical trial (NCT03355560). Patients with recurrent, resectable HNSCC were enrolled within 6 weeks of salvage surgery. Six 28-day cycles of adjuvant nivolumab were planned. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) more than 58%, based on an institutional historical control group of 71 patients with recurrent HNSCC who underwent salvage surgery.</p>Results:<p>Between February 2018 and February 2020, 39 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 22.1 months, 2-year DFS was 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 57.8–88.1] and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 73% (95% CI, 58–91.8). Three of 39 (8%) patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events and 3 of 39 (8%) discontinued treatment due to side effects. Ten of 39 had locoregional recurrence, while 2 of 10 also had synchronous metastatic disease. There was no difference in DFS between PD ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive and PD-L1–negative patients. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved DFS in patients with high tumor mutational burden (<i>P</i> = 0.083).</p>Conclusions:<p>Adjuvant nivolumab after salvage surgery in locally recurrent HNSCC is well tolerated and showed improved DFS compared with historical controls.</p></div>

Locoregional relapse in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is common, approaching 50% for some subsites despite multimodality therapy. Salvage surgery is the standard of care, but able to achieve durable control in only a minority of patients. While adjuvant radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy is offered to select patients, this approach can be prohibitively toxic. Given the activity and tolerability of programmed death-1 inhibitors in metastatic HNSCC, we investigated the safety and efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab after salvage surgical resection. This was an open-label, multi-institutional phase II clinical trial (NCT03355560). Patients with recurrent, resectable HNSCC were enrolled within 6 weeks of salvage surgery. Six 28-day cycles of adjuvant nivolumab were planned. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) more than 58%, based on an institutional historical control group of 71 patients with recurrent HNSCC who underwent salvage surgery. Between February 2018 and February 2020, 39 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 22.1 months, 2-year DFS was 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 57.8-88.1] and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 73% (95% CI, 58-91.8). Three of 39 (8%) patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events and 3 of 39 (8%) discontinued treatment due to side effects. Ten of 39 had locoregional recurrence, while 2 of 10 also had synchronous metastatic disease. There was no difference in DFS between PD ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive and PD-L1-negative patients. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved DFS in patients with high tumor mutational burden (P = 0.083). Adjuvant nivolumab after salvage surgery in locally recurrent HNSCC is well tolerated and showed improved DFS compared with historical controls.

491 Background: CheckMate 274 demonstrated a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) with nivolumab (NIVO) versus placebo (PBO) both in the intent-to-treat population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 98.22% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.90; P < 0.001) and in patients (pts) with tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% assessed by the tumor proportion score (TPS) (HR, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35–0.85; P < 0.001). An exploratory subgroup analysis showed a trend toward a DFS benefit with NIVO in pts with TPS < 1% (0.82; 95% CI, 0.63–1.06). To further characterize the relationship between PD-L1 expression and NIVO efficacy, we report an analysis of DFS based on PD-L1 expression in both tumor and immune cells using the combined positive score (CPS). Methods: CheckMate 274 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of NIVO versus PBO in pts with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery. Pts were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg or PBO every 2 weeks intravenously for 1 year of adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoints of the study are DFS in the intent-to-treat population and in pts with TPS ≥ 1%. The Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay was used to evaluate TPS. CPS was determined retrospectively from previously stained immunohistochemistry slides using the CPS algorithm. CPS was calculated as the number of both PD-L1 positive tumor and immune cells divided by the number of viable tumor cells in the evaluable tumor area, multiplied by 100; TPS was similarly calculated with the number of PD-L1 positive tumor cells as the numerator. This analysis only included pts with both quantifiable CPS and TPS. Results: Of the 629 pts with quantifiable TPS and CPS, 249 (40%) had TPS ≥ 1% (NIVO, n = 124; PBO, n = 125), 380 (60%) had TPS < 1% (NIVO, n = 191; PBO, n = 189), 557 (89%) had CPS ≥ 1 (NIVO, n = 281; PBO, n = 276), and 72 (11%) had CPS < 1 (NIVO, n = 34; PBO, n = 38). Within TPS < 1% pts, 81% (n = 309) had CPS ≥ 1. The number of pts and the DFS outcomes in pts with TPS ≥ 1% and CPS ≥ 1 are shown in the Table. In pts with TPS < 1% who also had CPS ≥ 1, median DFS (95% CI) was 19.2 (15.6–33.4) months with NIVO versus 10.1 (8.2–19.4) months with PBO. The HR for NIVO versus PBO in these pts was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.54–0.99). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of PD-L1 expression by CPS showed a higher proportion of pts with CPS ≥ 1 than TPS ≥ 1%, and that most pts with TPS < 1% had CPS ≥ 1. In the CPS ≥ 1 subgroup, median DFS with NIVO was more than double that with placebo. These results support the conclusion that pts with TPS < 1% also benefit from adjuvant NIVO. Clinical trial information: NCT02632409. [Table: see text]

Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) primary breast cancer (BC) includes a group of heterogeneous tumors, spanning from biologically indolent, ER signaling-driven to aggressive, endocrine-resistant tumors. Patients (pts) diagnosed with ER+, HER2− BC of high grade and/or low ER expression are at increased risk of relapse, despite current standard of care (SoC): chemotherapy and endocrine treatment (ET) in the neo- and adjuvant settings, respectively. New treatment options to increase cure rates are needed. Increased understanding of ER+, HER2− BC immune biology show an enrichment of cases with tumor cell recognition by the immune system and immune suppression mediated via programmed-death-1 (PD-1) signaling in pts with high-risk disease. Such features, linked with poorer prognosis and potential ET resistance, may be addressed through PD-1 inhibition combined with current SoC for pts with high-risk ER+, HER2− BC. Promising data assessing PD-1 inhibition coupled with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pts with high-risk ER+, HER2− BC noted improved pathologic complete response (pCR) which is identified as a valid surrogate endpoint for long-term clinical outcomes. Trial Design: CheckMate 7FL is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, global phase 3 study evaluating nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant ET in pts with high-risk, ER+, HER2− primary BC. Eligible pts are male or female, aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed grade 2 with ER expression of 1-9%, or grade 3, T1c-2, cN1-2 (tumor size >2 cm) centrally confirmed ER+, HER2− BC. Pts eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, with adequate organ function, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and tissue available for biomarker assessments will be enrolled. Pts with history of ipsilateral invasive BC regardless of treatment, ipsilateral ductal carcinoma in situ treated with radiotherapy, contralateral invasive BC at any time, grade ≥1 peripheral neuropathy, or those with prior treatment for the currently diagnosed BC are excluded. Approximately 1200 pts will be randomized 1:1 to NIVO or PBO, stratified by programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (+ or −), tumor grade (2 or 3), axillary nodal status (+ or −), and anthracycline + cyclophosphamide schedule (Q3W or Q2W). Node negative pts will be capped at 20% of the intent-to-treat population. In the neoadjuvant phase, pts will receive NIVO 360 mg Q3W or PBO plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 QW for four 3-week cycles, followed by NIVO 360 mg Q3W (or 240 mg Q2W) or matching PBO in combination with either doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Q3W (or Q2W, respectively, dose-dense schedule option) for 4 cycles. Pts will undergo surgery after completion of the neoadjuvant phase. Following surgery, pts will enter the adjuvant phase and receive NIVO 480 mg Q4W or PBO for 7 cycles plus investigator’s choice of ET per local SoC. Primary endpoints are pCR, defined as no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in breast and axillary lymph nodes as well as non-axillary sentinel node (ypT0/is, ypN0) as determined by local pathologist, and event-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival, distant-metastasis-free survival, safety, pCR (ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/is) rates, overall response rate, residual cancer burden, and quality of life. pCR rates will be compared using a 2-sided stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with alpha = 0.01. Event-free survival will be compared using a stratified 2-sided log-rank test with adjusted alpha at each interim analysis and at final analysis. Recruitment worldwide is expected to begin in November 2019. For further information, please contact Kristen.Letrent@bms.com. Citation Format: Sherene Loi, Heather McArthur, Nadia Harbeck, Lajos Pusztai, Suzette Delaloge, Kristen Letrent, Tian Chen, Bin Li, Kay Tatsuoka, Dimitrios Zardavas, Giuseppe Curigliano. Nivolumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- primary breast cancer: CheckMate 7FL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-03.

LBA4_PR - Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate 227 part 1 final analysis

4585 Background: In the CheckMate 274 trial, disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved with nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) both in intent-to-treat (ITT) patients (pts) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 98.22% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.90; P < 0.001) and in pts with tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% (HR, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35–0.85; P < 0.001). We report results for the subgroup of pts with bladder cancer, the most predominant type of urothelial carcinoma. Methods: CheckMate 274 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial of adjuvant NIVO vs PBO in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (bladder, ureter, renal pelvis) after radical resection. Pts were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks or PBO for ≤ 1 year of adjuvant treatment and stratified by nodal status, prior neoadjuvant cisplatin, and tumor PD-L1 expression. Pts had radical resection ± neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were at high risk of recurrence on final pathologic staging. Primary endpoints were DFS in ITT pts and in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1%. Non–urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS) was a secondary endpoint, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was an exploratory endpoint. This exploratory analysis focused on the subgroup of pts with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after radical resection. Results: Of 709 randomized pts in the trial, 560 had MIBC (NIVO, n = 279; PBO, n = 281). With a minimum follow-up of 11.0 months, a DFS benefit was observed with NIVO vs PBO in these pts, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression (Table). DFS probability at 12 months in all MIBC pts was 66% with NIVO and 45% with PBO. DFS was improved with NIVO vs PBO across subgroups according to age, sex, ECOG performance status, nodal status, and PD-L1 expression status. Improvement in NUTRFS and DMFS with NIVO vs PBO was also observed (Table). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17% and 6% of pts in the NIVO and PBO arms, respectively. Conclusions: Improvement in DFS was observed with NIVO over PBO in pts with MIBC after radical resection regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. The DFS benefit was observed in all prespecified subgroups. These results further support adjuvant NIVO as a standard-of-care treatment for pts with high-risk MIBC after radical resection ± neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02632409. [Table: see text]

PD10-01 DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL WITH LONGER FOLLOW-UP FROM THE CHECKMATE 274 TRIAL OF ADJUVANT NIVOLUMAB IN PATIENTS AFTER SURGERY FOR HIGH-RISK MUSCLE-INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA

128 Background: The prognosis of adv/met GC/GEJC among patients receiving third and later lines (L) of therapy is poor, and effective treatment options are limited. The study objective was to estimate the relative effect of NIVO versus SOC for overall survival (OS), in the US among adv/met GC/GEJC patients who received ≥ 3L therapy. Methods: A STC was performed using individual patient data from the single-arm CheckMate 032 (CM032) trial, and the Flatiron Health (FH) database. Eligible patients had adv/met GC/GEJC and received NIVO (CM032) or SOC (FH) as ≥ 3L therapy; all patients met CM032 eligibility criteria. A regression model of OS was fit to CM032 data using prognostic factors and treatment effect modifiers identified through a systematic literature review. The regression model was used to predict OS for NIVO, using Flatiron patient characteristics as covariates, and to estimate the expected outcome if NIVO had been available in the Flatiron population. The observed and predicted OS for NIVO was compared against the observed OS for SOC to generate naïve and adjusted hazard ratio comparisons of NIVO vs SOC. Results: In total, 42 and 43 patients were included from CM032 and Flatiron, respectively. In the Cox model, 19 prognostic factors were considered and the final model adjusted for 6, based on data availability across the two sources: ECOG, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and hemoglobin, sex, prior surgery, and tumor location. Median OS was 8.97 months in the NIVO group and 5.61 months in the SOC group. The STC adjustment yielded a hazard ratio of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.41 to 1.06) for NIVO vs SOC compared to the naïve estimate of 0.64 (0.40 to 1.03). Sensitivity analyses confirm this result. Conclusions: In the absence of head-to-head data, this study suggests that NIVO may confer a benefit in terms of OS versus SOC for patients with GC/GEJC in ≥ 3L therapy in the US setting. Despite the inherent limitations of using non-randomized comparisons of clinical trial data and real-world evidence, these findings provide insight into the potential benefit of novel agents such as NIVO.

6012 Background: EAGLE is a phase 3 study evaluating efficacy of D (anti-PD-L1 mAb) monotherapy and D+T (anti-CTLA-4 mAb) vs standard of care (SOC) in pts with R/M HNSCC who progressed following platinum-based therapy (NCT02369874). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to D 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W), D+T (D 20 mg/kg IV Q4W + T 1 mg/kg IV Q4W for 4 doses, then D 10 mg/kg IV Q2W), or SOC (investigator’s choice: cetuximab, taxane, methotrexate, or fluoropyrimidine-based regimen). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with dual primary objectives of D+T vs SOC and D vs SOC. Additional endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: 240 pts were randomized to D, 247 to D+T and 249 to SOC. An imbalance for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was seen in favor of the SOC arm (D, PS 0 = 26%, PS 1 = 74%; D+T, PS 0 = 26%, PS 1 = 74%; SOC, PS 0 = 32%, PS 1 = 68%). The risk of death was not statistically significantly different for D compared with SOC (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72–1.08; P = 0.20) or D+T vs SOC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.26; P = 0.76). Efficacy data are provided in the table. Treatment-related AEs Grade ≥3 were reported in 10.1% of pts (regardless of causality Grade ≥3 AEs were 41.4%) in the D arm, 16.3% (51.2%) for D+T, and 24.2% (44.2%) for SOC. Following treatment, 2% of pts in D, 5% in D+T and 15% in SOC received immunotherapy. Conclusions: D and D+T did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to standard chemotherapy in pts with R/M HNSCC. Median OS and ORR of D arm were similar to other studies with checkpoint inhibitors. The SOC arm outperformed what has been seen for SOC arms in previous studies; subsequent immunotherapy may have confounded the OS analyses. The safety profile for D and D + T in R/M HNSCC is consistent with previous trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02369874. [Table: see text]

Blinatumomab Added to Chemotherapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed NCI Standard Risk Pediatric B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results from the Randomized Children's Oncology Group Study AALL1731