Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion.

Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion is recommended in certain groups of women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors induce cervical ripening without uterine contractions, but the efficacy and side effects are of concern. To evaluate efficacy, side effects and complications of NO donors for cervical ripening before first-trimester surgical abortion. We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and POPLINE. We also searched reference lists of retrieved papers. We contacted experts in the field for information on both published and unpublished trials. Randomised controlled trials comparing NO donors alone or in combination with other methods for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted the data onto a data extraction form. We processed the data using Review Manager (RevMan5) software. We included nine studies involving 766 participants. There were no serious complications (infection requiring antibiotic treatment, blood transfusion, complications requiring unintended operation, cervical injury, uterine perforation, death or serious morbidity) in the trials included.NO donors were more effective in cervical ripening comparing with placebo or no treatment. Baseline cervical dilatation before the procedure was higher in NO donors group (mean difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.01, 0.58) The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm (mean difference -4.29, 95% CI -9.92, 1.35), headache (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.86, 3.46), abdominal pain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.50, 1.50) or patient satisfaction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84, 1.07) were not different. More nausea and vomiting occurred in the women who received a NO donor (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07, 6.45).NO donors were inferior to prostaglandins for cervical ripening. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8-9 mm was higher (mean difference 13.12, 95% CI 9.72, 16.52) and baseline cervical dilatation was less (mean difference -0.73, 95% CI -1.01, -0.45) in the NO donor group. Side effects including headache (RR 5.13, 95% CI 3.29, 8.00), palpitation (RR 3.43, 95% CI 1.64, 7.15), dizziness (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.46, 7.41) and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference 33.59 ml, 95% CI 24.50, 42.67) were also higher. However, abdominal pain (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25, 0.44) and vaginal bleeding (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07, 0.27) was less in the NO donor group. Patient satisfaction was not different.One trial compared a NO donor with a NO donor plus prostaglandin.The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm was higher (mean difference 14.50, 95% CI 0.50, 28.50) in the NO donor group. There was no difference in headache (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38, 2.00), abdominal pain (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02, 1.07) or intraoperative blood loss (mean difference -50, 95% CI -164.19, 64.19). NO donors are superior to placebo or no treatment, but inferior to prostaglandins for first-trimester cervical ripening, and associated with more side effects.

Cervical priming before first-trimester surgical abortion is recommended in certain groups of women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors induce cervical ripening without uterine contractions, but the efficacy and side effects are of concern. To evaluate efficacy, side effects and complications of NO donors for cervical ripening before first-trimester surgical abortion. We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Popline. We also searched reference lists of retrieved papers. We contacted experts in the field for information on both published and unpublished trials. Randomised controlled trials comparing NO donors alone or in combination with other methods for cervical ripening in first-trimester surgical abortion. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted the data onto a data extraction form. We processed the data using Review Manager (RevMan5) software. We included eight studies involving 718 participants. There were no serious complications (infection requiring antibiotic treatment, blood transfusion, complications requiring unintended operation, cervical injury, uterine perforation, death or serious morbidity) in the trials included.NO donors were ineffective in cervical ripening comparing with placebo or no treatment. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm (mean difference -4.29, 95% CI -9.92, 1.35), baseline cervical dilatation before the procedure (mean difference 0.21, 95% CI -0.12, 0.53), headache (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.86, 3.46), abdominal pain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51, 1.50) or patient satisfaction (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84, 1.07) were not different. More nausea and vomiting occurred in the women who received a NO donor (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.07, 6.75).NO donors were inferior to prostaglandins for cervical ripening. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8-9 mm was higher (mean difference 13.12, 95% CI 9.72, 16.52) and baseline cervical dilatation was less (mean difference -0.73, 95% CI -1.01, -0. 45) in the NO donor group. Side effects including headache (RR 5.13, 95% CI 3.29, 8.00), palpitation (RR 3.43, 95% CI 1.64, 7.15), dizziness (RR 3.29, 95% CI 1.46, 7.41) and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference 33.59 ml, 95% CI 24.50, 42.67) were also higher. However, abdominal pain (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.25, 0.44) and vaginal bleeding (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.07, 0.27) was less in the NO donor group. Patient satisfaction was not different.One trial compared a NO donor with a NO donor plus prostaglandin. The cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm was higher (mean difference 14.50, 95% CI 0.50, 28.50) in the NO donor group. There was no difference in headache (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38, 2.00), abdominal pain (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02, 1.07) or intraoperative blood loss (mean difference -50, 95% CI -164.19, 64.19). NO donors are inferior to prostaglandins for first-trimester cervical ripening, and associated with more side effects. NO donors are comparable to placebo and no treatment for cervical ripening.

Available data suggests that NO donors can be a useful tool in the process of induction of labour causing the cervix to be more favourable in comparison to placebo. However, additional data are needed to assess the true impact of NO donors on all important labour process and delivery outcomes.

It is unclear whether blood pressure should be altered actively during the acute phase of stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1997, and previously updated in 2001 and 2008. To assess the clinical effectiveness of altering blood pressure in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on blood pressure in acute stroke. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched in February 2014), the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews (CDSR) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 2), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1966 to May 2014), EMBASE (Ovid) (1974 to May 2014), Science Citation Index (ISI, Web of Science, 1981 to May 2014) and the Stroke Trials Registry (searched May 2014). Randomised controlled trials of interventions that aimed to alter blood pressure compared with control in participants within one week of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke. Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors cross-checked data and resolved discrepancies by discussion to reach consensus. We obtained published and unpublished data where available. We included 26 trials involving 17,011 participants (8497 participants were assigned active therapy and 8514 participants received placebo/control). Not all trials contributed to each outcome. Most data came from trials that had a wide time window for recruitment; four trials gave treatment within six hours and one trial within eight hours. The trials tested alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (A2AA), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), nitric oxide (NO) donors, thiazide-like diuretics, and target-driven blood pressure lowering. One trial tested phenylephrine.At 24 hours after randomisation oral ACEIs reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP, mean difference (MD) -8 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -17 to 1) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, MD -3 mmHg, 95% CI -9 to 2), sublingual ACEIs reduced SBP (MD -12.00 mm Hg, 95% CI -26 to 2) and DBP (MD -2, 95%CI -10 to 6), oral ARA reduced SBP (MD -1 mm Hg, 95% CI -3 to 2) and DBP (MD -1 mm Hg, 95% CI -3 to 1), oral beta blockers reduced SBP (MD -14 mm Hg; 95% CI -27 to -1) and DBP (MD -1 mm Hg, 95% CI -9 to 7), intravenous (iv) beta blockers reduced SBP (MD -5 mm Hg, 95% CI -18 to 8) and DBP (-5 mm Hg, 95% CI -13 to 3), oral CCBs reduced SBP (MD -13 mmHg, 95% CI -43 to 17) and DBP (MD -6 mmHg, 95% CI -14 to 2), iv CCBs reduced SBP (MD -32 mmHg, 95% CI -65 to 1) and DBP (MD -13, 95% CI -31 to 6), NO donors reduced SBP (MD -12 mmHg, 95% CI -19 to -5) and DBP (MD -3, 95% CI -4 to -2) while phenylephrine, non-significantly increased SBP (MD 21 mmHg, 95% CI -13 to 55) and DBP (MD 1 mmHg, 95% CI -15 to 16).Blood pressure lowering did not reduce death or dependency either by drug class (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.05), stroke type (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.05) or time to treatment (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.05). Treatment within six hours of stroke appeared effective in reducing death or dependency (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99) but not death (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.26) at the end of the trial. Although death or dependency did not differ between people who continued pre-stroke antihypertensive treatment versus those who stopped it temporarily (worse outcome with continuing treatment, OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.24), disability scores at the end of the trial were worse in participants randomised to continue treatment (Barthel Index, MD -3.2, 95% CI -5.8, -0.6). There is insufficient evidence that lowering blood pressure during the acute phase of stroke improves functional outcome. It is reasonable to withhold blood pressure-lowering drugs until patients are medically and neurologically stable, and have suitable oral or enteral access, after which drugs can than be reintroduced. In people with acute stroke, CCBs, ACEI, ARA, beta blockers and NO donors each lower blood pressure while phenylephrine probably increases blood pressure. Further trials are needed to identify which people are most likely to benefit from early treatment, in particular whether treatment started very early is beneficial.

Exogenous intravascular nitric oxide enhances ventricular function after hemodilution with plasma expander

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess the latest evidence on the preventive effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors in CIN in patients undergoing CAG/PCI. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until May 5th, 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3). Results: Our analysis included 13 RCTs encompassing 3,550 patients. NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CIN compared to placebo either as an oral administration (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.26, 0.42], P< 0.01) or IV infusions (RR: 0.56 with 95% CI [0.40, 0.78], P< 0.01). Moreover, NO donors were significantly associated with decreased serum creatinine levels compared to placebo either as an oral administration (MD: -0.07 with 95% CI [-0.10, -0.04], P< 0.01) or IV infusions (MD: -0.07 with 95% CI [-0.09, -0.04], P< 0.01). In terms of safety, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of MACE compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.64 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.89], P< 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in MACE (RR: 0.68 with 95% CI [0.38, 1.21], P= 0.18). Finally, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.36, 0.94], P= 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.84 with 95% CI [0.40, 8.52], P= 0.44). Conclusion: NO donors as an adjunct therapy are associated with reduced incidence of CIN, and decreased serum creatinine levels either as an oral or IV administration. Also, it was associated with decreased incidence of MACE and all-cause mortality as an oral administration which make this simple low-cost intervention an important therapeutic option in patients undergoing CAG/PCI.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess the latest evidence on the preventive effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors in CIN patients undergoing CAG/PCI. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until May 5th, 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3). Our analysis included 13 RCTs encompassing 3,550 patients. NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CIN compared to placebo either as an oral administration (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.26, 0.42], P < 0.01) or IV infusions (RR: 0.56 with 95% CI [0.40, 0.78], P < 0.01). Moreover, NO donors were significantly associated with decreased serum creatinine levels compared to placebo either as an oral administration (MD: - 0.07 with 95% CI [- 0.10, - 0.04], P < 0.01) or IV infusions (MD: - 0.07 with 95% CI [- 0.09, - 0.04], P < 0.01). In terms of safety, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.64 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.89], P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in MACE (RR: 0.68 with 95% CI [0.38, 1.21], P = 0.18). Finally, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.36, 0.94], P = 0.03). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between IV infusions of NO donors and placebo (RR: 1.84 with 95% CI [0.40, 8.52], P = 0.44). NO donors as adjunct therapy are associated with reduced incidence of CIN and decreased serum creatinine levels, either as an oral or IV administration. They were also associated with reduced incidence of MACE, all-cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction as an oral administration, which makes this simple, low-cost intervention an important therapeutic option in patients undergoing CAG/PCI.

Antisecretory and gastroprotective activities of compounds endowed with H 2 antagonistic and nitric oxide (NO) donor properties

Compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment, all tocolytic drug classes that we assessed (betamimetics, calcium channel blockers, magnesium sulphate, oxytocin receptor antagonists, nitric oxide donors) and their combinations were probably or possibly effective in delaying preterm birth for 48 hours, and 7 days. Tocolytic drugs were associated with a range of adverse effects (from minor to potentially severe) compared with placebo or no tocolytic treatment, although betamimetics and combination tocolytics were more likely to result in cessation of treatment. The effects of tocolytic use on neonatal outcomes such as neonatal and perinatal mortality, and on safety outcomes such as maternal and neonatal infection were uncertain.

Cinnamic acid and its derivatives have been studied for a variety of biological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, antihypertensive, and antibacterial. Many hybrids of cinnamic derivatives with other bioactive molecules have been synthesized and evaluated as nitric oxide (NO) donors. Since NO plays a significant role in various biological processes, including vasodilation, inflammation, and neurotransmission, NO donor groups are incorporated into the structures of already-known bioactive molecules to enhance their biological properties. In this review, we present cinnamic hybrids with NO-donating ability useful in the treatment of several diseases.

To investigate the interaction between hydrogen sulfide (H2S)/cystathionine gamma-lyase (CSE) system and nitric oxide (NO)/nitric oxide synthase (NOS) system on cardiac protection in metabolic syndrome (MS) rats. Forty one male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 6 groups: control group, MS group, H2S donor group, CSE inhibitor group, NOS inhibitor group, and NO donor group. The MS rat model was established by a high-fat diet of 16 weeks. Rats in control and MS groups were subjected to normal saline and the other four groups were respectively subjected to sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS, 56 μmol/kg), D,L-propargylglycine (PPG, 37.5 mg/kg), Nψ-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 18 mg/kg), L-Arginine (500 mg/kg) every day. Four weeks later, the obesity indices, blood sugar of oral glucose tolerance test in each time point (0,30,60, and 120 minutes) and blood lipids (cholesterol, triglyceride, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein) were measured. The computer-based electrophysiological recorder system was used to measure the changes of the left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), the left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), the maximal rate of pressure increase in the contraction phase (+dP/dtmax), and the maximal rate of pressure decrease in the diastole phase (-dP/dtmax). H2S and NO concentration in plasma and myocardium, as well as CSE, constitutive NOS (cNOS), and inducible NOS (iNOS) activities in myocardium were measured with colorimetric method. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to assess the gene expression of CSE and endothelial NOS (eNOS) mRNAs. Compared with control group, the obesity indices, blood sugar at each time point, and blood lipids significantly increased in MS group (P<0.05). H2S and NO concentration in plasma and myocardium, CSE and cNOS activities in myocardium, the expressions of CSE mRNA and eNOS mRNA, and the myocardial function significantly decreased in MS group (P<0.05). Compared with MS group, NO concentration in plasma and myocardium, cNOS and iNOS activities in myocardium, and the expression of eNOS mRNA significantly increased in CSE inhibitor group (P<0.05). However, activities of cNOS and iNOS in myocardium and the expression of eNOS mRNA were significantly decreased in H2S donor group (P<0.01), while the myocardial function significantly increased (P<0.05). H2S concentration in plasma and myocardium, and the expression of CSE mRNA significantly increased in NOS inhibitor group (P<0.05). However, in NO donor group, the CSE activity in myocardium and the expression of CSE mRNA significantly decreased (P<0.05). And the myocardial function was improved significantly (P<0.05). Both the H2S/CSE and NO/NOS systems appear to have a mutual down-regulation effect on myocardium in MS rats. Meanwhile, exogenous H2S and NO supplement is cardioprotective in rat model of MS.

Sometimes it is necessary to bring on labour artificially because of safety concerns for the mother or baby. This review is one of a series of reviews of methods of labour induction using a standardised protocol.Induction of labour occurs in approximately 20% of pregnancies in the UK. The ideal agent for induction of labour would induce cervical ripening without causing uterine contractions. Currently most commonly used cervical ripening or induction agents result in uterine activity or contractions, or both. Cervical ripening without uterine contractility could occur safely in an outpatient setting and it may be expected that this would result in greater maternal satisfaction and lower costs. To determine the effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour, in comparison with placebo or no treatment or other treatments from a predefined hierarchy. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 December 2010) and the reference lists of trial reports and reviews. Clinical trials comparing NO donors for cervical ripening or labour induction to other methods listed above it on a predefined list of methods of labour induction. The trials include some form of random allocation to either group; and report one or more of the prestated outcomes. NO donors (isosorbide mononitrate, nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside) are compared to other methods listed above it on a predefined list of methods of labour induction. This review is part of a series of reviews focusing on methods of induction of labour. Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We considered 19 trials; we included 10 (including a total of 1889 women) trials, excluded eight trials and one trial report is awaiting classification. Included studies compared NO donors to placebo, vaginal prostaglandin E2, intracervical PGE2 and vaginal misoprostol. All included studies were of a generally high standard with a low risk of bias.There are very limited data available to compare nitric oxide donors to any other induction agent. There is no evidence of any difference between any of the prespecified outcomes when comparing NO donors to other induction agents, with the exception of an increase in maternal side effects. NO donors do not appear currently to be a useful tool in the process of induction of labour. More studies are required to examine how NO donors may work alongside established induction of labour protocols, especially those based in outpatient settings.

Vaginal administration of prostaglandin analogues as well as nitric oxide donors before first-trimester surgical abortion has been shown to induce effective cervical ripening. In addition, nitric oxide donors, such as isosorbide mononitrate and nitroglycerin, have been associated with a patient-friendly side-effect profile when administered 3 h before the surgical procedure. We wanted to compare the cervical ripening effect and possible side effects of isosorbide mononitrate and the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol when self-administered at bedtime the evening before surgical abortion. One hundred and twenty nulliparous women scheduled for suction termination of pregnancy in the first trimester were randomly assigned to receive per vaginam either 40 mg of isosorbide mononitrate or 200 microg of misoprostol. Sixty of the women were included for assessment of cervical ripening as well as evaluation of side effects. The other 60 women were recruited for assessment of side effects only. Cervical ripening was evaluated by measuring baseline cervical dilation and the cumulative force to dilate the cervix to 9 mm by means of a cervical tonometer. For assessment of side effects, the women were asked to complete a symptom questionnaire. Cervical resistance was significantly higher in women treated with isosorbide mononitrate compared to misoprostol (median cumulative force 73 versus 15 N). Common side effects of misoprostol were abdominal pain (69%), nausea (44%), and vaginal bleeding (66%), while in the isosorbide mononitrate group headache was frequently experienced (79%). In both treatment groups, the frequency and intensity of side effects gradually increased during the treatment interval. Misoprostol induced a more pronounced cervical ripening than isosorbide mononitrate, but both regimens were associated with a high frequency of side effects.

Introduction: In pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury (IRI) the role of nitric oxide (NO) is not completely understood. Using a rat model of normothermic in situ IRI, the effect of endogenous and exogenous NO donors on post-ischemic tissue oxygenation and tissue damage was investigated. Methods: IR was induced by 2-hour normothermic in situ ischemia of a pancreatic tail segment pedunculated on the splenic vessels with 2 h of reperfusion in an untreated, an L-arginine- and a sodium-nitroprusside-treated group (Wistar rats, n = 7/group). Animals without ischemia served as controls. Tissue oxygenation (pO_2ti) was monitored using a pO₂-sensitive Clark-type electrode. Histological investigation was performed following a semiquantitative score (edema, vacuolization, PMN infiltration, necrosis). Plasma lipase was another marker of organ damage. Results: The administration of L-arginine and sodium nitroprusside caused a significant amelioration of the decrease in pO_2ti after reperfusion compared to IR animals (p < 0.05). Histological damage was also reduced in the NO donor groups (p < 0.05). After reperfusion, plasma lipase in the L-arginine-treated animals was significantly lower compared to IR and sodium nitroprusside (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The administration of both endogenous and exogenous NO donors is protective in IRI of the rat pancreas which can be seen by an improvement in post-ischemic tissue oxygenation which indicates better nutritive tissue perfusion, amelioration of the histological tissue injury and, in L-arginine animals, lower lipase levels. NO donors could be useful in the prevention and reduction of the pancreatic IRI.

To compare the impact of clomiphene citrate (CC) vs other drug regimens on mid-cycle endometrial thickness (EMT), ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates in women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II ovulatory disorders. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) and the non-MEDLINE subset of PubMed from inception to December 2016 and cross-checked references of relevant articles. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CC used alone vs other drug regimens for ovulation induction in women with WHO group II anovulation. Outcomes were mid-cycle EMT, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates. We pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous variables (EMT) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI for binary variables (ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates). We retrieved 1718 articles of which 33 RCTs (4349 women, 7210 ovulation induction cycles) were included. In 15 RCTs that compared CC with letrozole, EMT was lower in the CC group (1957 women, 3892 cycles; WMD, -1.39; 95% CI, -2.27 to -0.51; I2 = 100%), ovulation rates after CC and letrozole were comparable (1710 women, 3217 cycles; RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04; I2 = 47%), while CC led to a lower pregnancy rate (1957 women, 3892 cycles; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; I2 = 43%) and a lower live birth rate (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98; I2 = 35%). In two RCTs that compared CC with CC plus metformin, EMT, ovulation and pregnancy rates were comparable (101 women, 140 cycles; WMD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.92 to 0.45; I2 = 78%; RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.06; I2 = 0%; and RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.33-1.87; I2 = 0%). In three studies that compared CC with CC plus N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), EMT was lower in the CC group (340 women, 300 cycles; WMD, -1.51; 95% CI, -1.98 to -1.04; I2 = 45%). In two studies that compared CC with CC + nitric oxide (NO) donor, EMT was lower in the CC group (120 women, 304 cycles; WMD, -1.75; 95% CI, -2.08 to -1.41; I2 = 0%). Compared with CC plus NO donor or NAC, CC showed statistically significant lower ovulation and pregnancy rates. Compared with tamoxifen in three studies, CC showed a tendency towards lower EMT (571 women, 844 cycles; WMD, -1.34; 95% CI, -2.70 to 0.01; I2 = 96%) with comparable ovulation and pregnancy rates. In women with WHO group II ovulatory disorders, ovulation induction with CC might result in lower EMT than other ovulation induction regimens. Whether the lower EMT caused the lower pregnancy and live birth rates remains to be elucidated. Letrozole seems to be beneficial for these women. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution as the quality of evidence was very low. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.