Abstract
It is becoming increasingly apparent that pyridoxine responsive homocystinuria patients are being missed by newborn screening programs. The possibility that screening for homocystine, rather than the methionine, might be more effective was investigated by comparing homocystine and methionine levels of non-responsive patients at diagnosis. The plasma methionine levels of 11 infants were much more abnormal than the homocystine levels. Urine homocystine was low or not detectable and always less than methionine. Therefore, methionine determination is much more effective than homocystine determination for newborn screening for homocystinuria. It seems that a second blood specimen at a later age may be required to find the pyridoxine responsive infants.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
