Abstract
The corrosion protection, repair and maintenance of reinforced concrete structures located along the coast of Australia has been a challenging task for engineers and asset owners over the past thirty years. Most of these structures are bridges and wharves which are situated in marine environments and are subject to tidal exposure. These environmental conditions create challenges in planning repair work, especially if electrochemical systems such as cathodic protection are installed for corrosion protection of these assets. While impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) is a proven technology which can provide long-term corrosion prevention solutions for marine structures, this technology has been viewed by many asset owners as overly complex and expensive. There is the perception that ICCP systems require costly permanent monitoring programs and have high maintenance costs. These perceptions have been supported by the frequent failure of power supply units, and in some cases, widespread defects associated with ICCP systems such as grout acidification in concrete elements situated in tidal zones. The perception about the complexity of ICCP technology has led to the selection of less effective galvanic-based systems for the protection of assets, and systems which require no monitoring and have low maintenance requirements. This paper will present information on the new developments which have emerged from long-term experience and research work related to the simplification in the design, installation and improved monitoring of ICCP systems.
Highlights
Impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) for reinforced concrete structures has been employed on a large number of concrete structures in Australia over the past thirty years, and up until recently, impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) has been the technology of choice by asset owners for the corrosion protection of chloride contaminated structures
This paper will present the theory of ICCP and galvanic anode systems, highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and present various information about recent new developments and improvements related to the simplification in the design, installation and monitoring of ICCP systems
Providing the embedded reference electrodes are placed as recommended by the applicable standards, larger circuits can be used for ICCP systems without compromising corrosion protection and current distribution
Summary
Impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) for reinforced concrete structures has been employed on a large number of concrete structures in Australia over the past thirty years, and up until recently, ICCP has been the technology of choice by asset owners for the corrosion protection of chloride contaminated structures. In spite of the proven long-term benefits of ICCP technology, in recent years some assets owners have been inclined to select galvanic-based anode systems for the corrosion protection of their assets. One of the primary reasons has been the perception that galvanic based anode systems offer the same level of corrosion protection to structures as ICCP systems, while eliminating the requirements for ongoing monitoring and maintenance work. This paper will present the theory of ICCP and galvanic anode systems, highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and present various information about recent new developments and improvements related to the simplification in the design, installation and monitoring of ICCP systems
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.