Abstract

Abstract For most CCS projects, captured CO2 is transported by pipeline, in contrast to shipping it, which has only been introduced as a secondary option for long distances and small amounts. This paper provides some possible alternatives to reduce the total cost of CCS through CO2 shipping. The benefits of HP pump in power consumption is considered and a new total CCS chain is suggested, which can be divided into capture, liquefaction (or compression to supercritical fluid), transport by ship, compression by HP pump, and storage. With a highly efficient liquefaction process, CO2 shipping costs can be reduced under a new total CCS chain. The results of our study show that an optimal size needs to be adopted for each CCS project, enabling CO2 shipping to be more cost efficient. DSME has developed a concept design for a large CO2 carrier that has the potential to be more cost-effective than conventional transport. Therefore, CO2 transport by ship should now be seriously re-considered as an effective transport method on a project-by-project basis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.