Abstract

The main limitation of multi-detector GPC arises from the nature of detector sensitivities in the tails of a polymer distribution. In the low molecular weight tail of this distribution, molecular weight-sensitive detectors (such as a capillary viscometer or a static laser light-scattering photometer) have low sensitivity while concentration detectors (e.g., differential refractometer) have high sensitivity. This situation is reversed in the high molecular weight tail. These imbalances in sensitivity raise the question of how best to obtain an estimate of column calibration curves. The question is central to the successful application of the multi-detector GPC technique. For example, the accuracy and precision with which structural information for polymers with broad molecular weight distribution, especially with long-chain branches, can be obtained depends critically on the accurate estimation of such calibration curves in the tails. Traditionally, calibration curves are fit to the logarithm of the ratios of detector responses. However, the logarithm of a ratio will not give meaningful values in the regions where at least one of the responses is near zero. Thus, low detector sensitivity in the tails requires that a calibration curve be fit only to the heart of the peak, where all detectors have good response. The optimized curve is then extrapolated to the regions in the tails that were excluded from the fit. This data truncation has two consequences that limit the accuracy and precision of the multi-detector GPC technique. Truncation eliminates potentially useful responses with which to constrain the calibration curves, and the resulting curves can be sensitive to the choice of the fitting region. We describe a new data analysis method for multi-detector GPC where the complete chromatographic profile obtained from one detector is compared, in a least-squares sense, to a model that is a function of responses from the other detector. This formulation of least-squares avoids the use of logarithms, ratios, and eliminates the need for extrapolation. The approach allows the inclusion of regions in the least-squares fit that contain low detector's signal, e.g., near baseline responses that fluctuate about zero from either, or both, detectors. We apply this approach to obtain column calibration curves with each of two molecular weight-sensitive detectors, coupled to a GPC system. Such calibration curves are the necessary intermediate steps in determining the polymer's molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity distributions. If suitable calibration standards are available, we further show how the polymer's intrinsic viscosity law can be obtained directly from dual-detector responses without requiring - or depending on - a sample-dependent calibration curve.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.