Abstract
IntroductionIt has been suggested that psychotic bipolar patients have more severe cognitive deficits and lower functioning that non-psychotic bipolar patients.ObjectivesTo evaluate neurocognitive and functional performance in stabilized psychotic bipolar patients (BP+), non-psychotic bipolar patients (BP−) and schizophrenia patients (SZ).AimsTo examine whether BP+ might be defined as a more homogenous subtype of bipolar disorder with more severe cognitive deficit and more severe functional impairment.MethodsFifty TB+, 50 TB−, 50 SZ and 51 controls were evaluated with a comprehensive neurocognitive battery (WCST, FAS, TMT-A and B, Stroop Test, Digits span, letters and numbers – WMS-III−, CVLT, ROCFT, CPT-DS). Moreover, patients were evaluated with clinical scales (PANSS, MADRS, YMRS) and functionality scales (WHOs Disability Assessment Scales, QLS and GAF). IBM SPSS Statistics (version 19.0) was used to the data analysis.ResultsNo significant differences were found between three patients’ samples (P < 0.0001). No significant differences in neurocognitive measures were found between BP+ and BP−. Significant differences were found between both groups of bipolar patients and schizophrenia in working memory measures (P < 0.0001). BP+ and BP− showed significant higher functionality than SZ (P < 0.0001), without significant differences in functionality between BP+ and BP−.ConclusionsThe pattern of neurocognitive and functional deficit is similar in BP+ and BP−. The neurocognitive deficit is very similar in both groups of bipolar patients groups in comparison to SZ; functionality is better in both bipolar groups than in schizophrenia patients.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.