Neural correlates of conversational turn-taking perception in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Cognitive impairment plays a crucial role in the development from clinical high-risk(CHR) to schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis. Understanding its dynamic change trajectories has significant preventive value. This study aims to comprehensively explore the dynamic cognitive trajectories of clinical high-risk(CHR) individuals over a three-year period, compare the trajectories among CHR individuals who convert to psychosis(CHR-C), those who do not(CHR-NC), and healthy controls(HC). This prospective study was part of the Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis(SHARP)-extended program. CHR participants, from psychological counseling outpatient clinics and medication - naive, were followed up at baseline (T1), 2 months ± 1 week (T2), 1 year ± 1 month (T3), 2 years ± 1 month (T4), and 3 years ± 1 month (T5). All participants completed the Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery(MCCB) at these five strictly fixed time points to assess neurocognitive function. Conversion to psychosis was determined as main outcome. A total of 43 CHR(median age, 16[IQR, 15-18] years; 14 men[32.6%]) and 18 HC(median age, 17[IQR, 16-18] years; 8 men[44.4%]) completed five fixed-time cognitive assessments over three years. During the three-year period, CHR individuals were categorized into CHR-C(n = 19) and CHR-NC(n = 24). CHR-C individuals showed more significant cognitive impairments at all time points compared to CHR-NC and HC. The cognitive decline in CHR-C was most prominent in the first year. Growth curve modeling showed that, compared with the HC group, the CHR-C group had a significant negative impact on the composite score of neurocognition(t = -2.809, p = 0.007), and the effect of time is marginally significant(t = -1.911, p = 0.057). The repeated-measures analysis of variance(RMANOVA) indicated significant differences among groups and time-related changes in cognitive scores. Over the entire period, there were highly significant main effects of Time(F = 15.162, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.275) and Group(F = 17.896, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.472). Moreover, different cognitive domains exhibited distinct change trends across the three groups. The first year after CHR identification is a critical period for observing cognitive changes. These findings emphasize short-term cognitive changes' importance in predicting psychosis and inform early intervention strategies.

Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia (AMP® SCZ): developing tools to enable early intervention in the psychosis highrisk state.

Adolescents and young adults at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis report few close friends. Social support has been linked to conversion to psychosis and psychosis relapse in CHR individuals. Expanding earlier research on loneliness and friendships at a single timepoint, this study described composition and changes in social network and its association with clinical and cognitive symptoms among CHR adolescents. Ninety five individuals (46 CHR individuals, 49 healthy volunteers) completed baseline and 1-year follow-up Social Network Index (SNI) evaluations and clinical interviews. Analyses first examined SNI size and composition across 10 categories (e.g., family, close friends, coworkers, classmates) between groups. Then, the relationship between SNI size and baseline social symptoms (i.e., paranoia, social anhedonia, social anxiety, social cognition), social function, and changes in symptoms and social networks over 1-year were examined within the CHR group. CHR individuals showed smaller social networks overall, driven by fewer friendships and family relationships. Social cognition and social anxiety significantly related to SNI size at baseline, but social anhedonia and paranoia did not. SNI size related to social function, but with a modest effect size (r's=.45 and .56). Surprisingly, an increase in positive symptom severity related to an increase in familial but a decrease in coworker social network size. The social support deficits in the CHR group were specific to relatives and friendships, with social anxiety and social cognition as implicated symptoms. Social relationships may serve as a promising early intervention target in individuals at CHR for psychosis.

BackgroundIn 2010, the “ShangHai At Risk for Psychosis (SHARP)” study was launched at the Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC), the largest outpatient mental health clinic in China. The Chinese SHARP research was led by Dr. Larry Seidman, who was also the PI of the Harvard site of the NAPLS project. He had implemented methods very similar to those used in NAPLS for the identification of clinical high risk (CHR) individuals in Mainland China in studies jointly funded by the United States National Institute of Mental Health and Chinese funding agencies.MethodsDr. Seidman began a collaboration with the SMHC by advising us in carrying out an epidemiological study and then received joint funding for an R21 MH093294 (Fogarty/NIH, “Broadening the Investigation of Psychosis Prodrome to Different Cultural Groups”) designed to implement a variety of clinical, neurocognitive and event related potential (ERP) measures in a preliminary study of CHR. That study, which began in April 2012 and ended in March 2015, aimed to build research capacity at the SMHC. He guide us provided 4 in-person research and clinical skills trainings (2 in SMHC, 2 in Boston), translated a widely used CHR diagnostic instrument (the Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms/SIPS), and trained China partners to conduct a preliminary study of 100 CHR individuals. Building upon the R21 project, and the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Studies (NAPLS) model, the same group of researchers led by Dr. Seidman is collaborating on an NIMH R01 101052-01 project (2013 to 2016) to examine biomarkers of CHR with 1 year follow-up. The R21 and R01 collaborations between Harvard Medical School (HMS), MIT, Florida A&M University (FAMU), and SMHC investigators have capitalized on the resources and experiences of the Harvard researchers as members of NAPLS, MIT researchers’ leading role in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and FAMU researchers’ expertise in bridging western and Chinese cultures to enhance the existing capacity of Chinese researchers studying the biopsychosocial aspects of CHR. Finally, a stratified cohort of 300 CHR participants was recruited between 2012–2015, and followed up for at least 1 year.ResultsWith the hope of Dr. Seidman, the SHARP project is ongoing and getting better, larger and stronger. Of the total 417 CHR participants (previous epidemiological survey [CHR, n = 117], R21 [CHR, n = 100], R01 [CHR, n =200]), 349 completed at least a year of follow-up (until August 30, 2017; the longest follow-up case was six and a half years), in which 83 converted to psychosis, and 68 were lost. Preliminary data showed about 20% CHR converted to a psychotic disorder over the course of follow-up, several clinical factors such as 1) functional decline; 2) selected positive symptoms(unusual thoughts and suspiciousness); 3) selected negative symptoms(social anhedonia, expression of emotion, and ideational richness); biological factors such as the P300 auditory ERP; fMRI: Reduced anti-correlation between the bilateral parietal lobule and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Structural MRI: superior temporal gyrus. et al. are account for increasing the risk of conversion to full psychosis.DiscussionThis is the first, well-implemented, longitudinal study of CHR in a low and middle-income country to comprehensively investigate clinical and biological factors in predicting psychosis conversion and illness progression. Dr. Seidman provide a critical step in the implementation of CHR concept in China, just as an obvious need and urgency for prevention and early intervention for Chinese patients with schizophrenia.

BackgroundIndividuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have symptoms, including social and sensory deficits, and neurobiological alterations that overlap with schizophrenia. Though there is evidence of high rates of psychosis symptoms in ASD, little is known about psychosis prodrome in ASD, or about predictors of psychosis conversion in this population. In this study, we leverage data from clinical high risk (CHR) patients from the NAPLS2 consortium to examine: a) baseline differences in psychosis symptoms and social functioning, b) relative risk of conversion, and c) whether neural response to sensory stimuli yields differential predictors of conversion in CHR individuals with and without ASD (CHR/ASD+; CHR/ASD-).MethodsClinical, electrophysiological, and 24-month follow-up data were available for 305 individuals (14 CHR/ASD+; 291 CHR/ASD-). We examined baseline differences on the SOPS, GFS, and TASIT. Conversion risk was computed with the Cannon conversion calculator, and conversion was defined as SOPS>6 at 2-year outcome. P300 event-related potentials (ERP) were extracted from ongoing EEG collected at baseline in response to Target and Novel auditory and visual stimuli, each presented on 10% of trials within streams of 80% standard stimuli in the same modality.ResultsIn line with our expectations, CHR/ASD+ had worse functioning than CHR/ASD- on the GF-Social scale (t=-4.2, p<.01) and TASIT total score (t=-2.9, p=<.01), but groups did not differ in their psychotic symptoms on the SOPS (Positive: p=.72; Negative: p=.13; Disorganization: p=.13; General: p=.86). Groups did not differ in the rate at which they converted to psychosis (CHR/ASD+: 15.4%; CHR/ASD-: 11.1%; p=.50), and the Cannon risk score was equally predictive of 2-year conversion across groups (p=.39). EEG data revealed dissociable profiles regarding neural response to sensory stimuli in those who did versus did not convert to psychosis, depending on ASD status. P300 response over central electrodes to Novel visual stimuli was weaker in CHR- converters (n=71) than CHR- non-converters (n=220), but stronger in CHR/ASD+ converters (n=4) than CHR/ASD+ non-converters (n=10) (Novel Stimuli: Modality by ASD interaction, F=5.66, p=.02; Modality by ASD by Converter Interaction, F=3.57, p=.06). For both auditory and visual Target stimuli, P300 response over parietal electrodes did not differ between CHR/ASD- converters and non-converters; however, whereas CHR/ASD+ individuals who did not convert had amplitudes similar to all CHR/ASD- individuals, CHR/ASD+ converters had substantially greater auditory and visual P300 amplitudes (Target Stimuli: ASD by Converter interaction, F=12.12, p=.001).DiscussionIndividuals with ASD and CHR have greater social deficits than the general CHR population, but show similar psychotic symptoms and have similar risk for conversion to psychosis. Neural response to sensory stimuli is important for understanding risk for conversion, and differs among CHR individuals dependent on whether they have ASD. In particular, whereas all CHR individuals who do not convert share a common pattern of attenuated ERP amplitudes reflecting attention allocation to target and novel auditory and visual stimuli, CHR/ASD+ who convert have a unique pattern of globally heightened P300 responses to infrequent novel and target stimuli. These findings have two important implications: 1) individuals with ASD do convert to psychosis and have similar CHR symptom and risk profiles to non-ASD CHR patients clinically; 2) in CHR individuals with ASD in particular, examining neural markers of attention allocation to sensory stimuli may reveal important predictive clues about risk for conversion.

Schizophrenia shows abnormal dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC), but it is unclear whether these abnormalities are present early in the illness course or precede illness onset in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. We examined dFNC from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data in CHR (n = 53), early illness schizophrenia (ESZ; n = 58), and healthy control (HC; n = 70) individuals. We applied a sliding temporal window approach capturing five distinct dFNC states. In ESZ patients, the likelihood of transitioning from state 4, a state that exhibited greater cortical-subcortical hyperconnectivity and also lacked typically observed anticorrelation between the default mode network and other functional networks, to a hypoconnected state was increased compared with HC and CHR groups. Furthermore, we investigated the interaction of group and state on dFNC. Overall, HC individuals showed significant changes of connectivity between states that were absent or altered in ESZ patients and CHR individuals. Connectivity differences between groups were identified primarily in two out of the five states, in particular, between HC and ESZ groups. In summary, it appears that the interaction effect was mostly driven by (1) dynamic connectivity changes in HC that were abnormal in CHR and ESZ individuals and (2) the fact that dysconnectivity between groups was only present in some states. These findings underscore the likelihood that abnormalities are present not only in static FNC but also in dFNC, in individuals at CHR for schizophrenia.

Preclinical and human data suggest that hippocampal dysfunction plays a critical role in the onset of psychosis. Neural hyperactivity in the hippocampus is thought to drive an increase in subcortical dopamine function through glutamatergic projections to the striatum. To examine the association between hippocampal glutamate levels in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and their subsequent clinical outcomes. This cross-sectional study of 86 individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and 30 healthy control individuals, with a mean follow-up of 18.5 months, was conducted between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2017, at early detection services in London and Cambridge, United Kingdom. Concentrations of glutamate and other metabolites were measured in the left hippocampus using 3-T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at the first clinical presentation. At follow-up, clinical outcomes were assessed in terms of transition or nontransition to psychosis using the Comprehensive Assessment of the At-Risk Mental State criteria and the level of overall functioning using the Global Assessment of Function scale. Of 116 total participants, 86 were at clinical high risk for psychosis (50 [58%] male; mean [SD] age, 22.4 [3.5] years) and 30 were healthy controls (14 [47%] male; mean [SD] age, 24.7 [3.8] years). At follow-up, 12 clinical high-risk individuals developed a first episode of psychosis whereas 74 clinical high-risk individuals did not; 19 clinical high-risk individuals showed good overall functioning (Global Assessment of Function ≥65), whereas 38 clinical high-risk individuals had a poor functional outcome (Global Assessment of Function <65). Compared with clinical high-risk individuals who did not become psychotic, clinical high-risk individuals who developed psychosis showed higher hippocampal glutamate levels (mean [SD], 8.33 [1.48] vs 9.16 [1.28] glutamate levels; P = .048). The clinical high-risk individuals who developed psychosis also had higher myo-inositol levels (mean [SD], 7.60 [1.23] vs 6.24 [1.36] myo-inositol levels; P = .002) and higher creatine levels (mean [SD], 8.18 [0.74] vs 7.32 [1.09] creatine levels; P = .01) compared with clinical high-risk individuals who did not become psychotic, and higher myo-inositol levels compared with healthy controls (mean [SD], 7.60 [1.23] vs 6.19 [1.51] myo-inositol levels; P = .005). Higher hippocampal glutamate levels in clinical high-risk individuals were also associated with a poor functional outcome (mean [SD], 8.83 [1.43] vs 7.76 [1.40] glutamate levels; P = .02). In the logistic regression analyses, hippocampal glutamate levels were significantly associated with clinical outcome in terms of transition and nontransition to psychosis (β = 0.48; odds ratio = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00-2.59; P = .05) and overall functioning (β = 0.53; odds ratio = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.10-2.66; P = .02). The findings indicate that adverse clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis may be associated with an increase in baseline hippocampal glutamate levels, as well as an increase in myo-inositol and creatine levels. This conclusion suggests that these measures could contribute to the stratification of clinical high-risk individuals according to future clinical outcomes.

BackgroundStructural magnetic resonance imaging studies in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis have yielded conflicting results. MethodsThe aims of this study were to compare intracranial and structural brain volumes and variability of CHR individuals with those of healthy control (HC) subjects and to investigate brain volume differences and variability in CHR subjects with and without transition to psychosis. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies published before June 1, 2020. ResultsA total of 34 studies were deemed eligible, which included baseline data of 2111 CHR and 1472 HC participants. In addition, data were included for 401 CHR subjects who subsequently transitioned to psychosis and 1023 nontransitioned CHR participants. Whole-brain and left, right, and bilateral hippocampal volume were significantly smaller in CHR subjects than in HC subjects. Cerebrospinal fluid and lateral ventricle volumes were significantly larger in CHR subjects than in HC subjects. Variability was not significantly different in CHR subjects compared with HC subjects. CHR individuals with and without subsequent transition to psychosis did not show significant differences in any of the volumetric assessments or in variability. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrates reduced whole-brain and hippocampal volumes and increased cerebrospinal fluid and lateral ventricle volumes in CHR individuals. However, no significant differences were observed in any of the volumetric assessments between CHR individuals with and without subsequent transition to psychosis. These findings suggest that although structural brain alterations are present before the onset of the disorder, they may not significantly contribute to the identification of CHR individuals at the highest risk for the development of psychosis.

Early detection and prospective evaluation of clinical high-risk (CHR) individuals who may develop schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders is critical for predicting psychosis onset and for testing preventive interventions. To elucidate the neuropsychology of the CHR syndrome, to determine the association of neuropsychological function with conversion to psychosis and family history of psychosis, and to examine whether baseline neuropsychological functioning predicts subsequent psychosis. Longitudinal study with 2(1/2) years of follow-up. Eight centers participating in the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Three hundred four prospectively identified CHR individuals meeting Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes criteria, 52 non-CHR persons with a family history of psychosis in first- or second-degree relatives (family high-risk group), and 193 normal controls with neither a family history of psychosis nor a CHR syndrome, all of whom underwent baseline neuropsychological evaluations. A neurocognitive composite score, 8 individual neuropsychological measures, an IQ estimate, and high-risk status. Global ("composite") neuropsychological functioning was comparably impaired in the CHR and family high-risk groups compared with controls, but profiles differed significantly between groups. Neuropsychological functioning in the CHR group was significantly lower in persons who progressed to psychosis than in those who did not and was worst in the subgroup with a family history of psychosis. Tests of processing speed and verbal learning and memory were most sensitive in discriminating CHR individuals from controls, although reductions were less severe than in established schizophrenia. Neuropsychological functioning did not contribute uniquely to the prediction of psychosis beyond clinical criteria, but worse verbal memory predicted more rapid conversion. These findings document that CHR individuals have significant neuropsychological difficulties, particularly those who later develop psychosis. This dysfunction is generally of moderate severity but less than in first-episode schizophrenia, suggesting that further decline may occur after baseline CHR assessment.

Bullying is associated with a heightened risk for poor outcomes, including psychosis. This study aimed to replicate previous findings on bullying prevalence in clinical high-risk (CHR) individuals, to assess the longitudinal course of clinical and functional variables between bullied and non-bullied CHR and the association of bullying with premorbid functioning, clinical outcome, transition to psychosis and risk of violence. The sample consisted of 691 CHR participants and 96 healthy controls. Participants reported whether they had experienced bullying and how long it had lasted. Assessments included DSM-5 diagnoses, attenuated psychotic symptoms, negative symptoms, social and role functioning, depression, stress, premorbid functioning, and risk of violence. The bullied and non-bullied CHR groups were compared at baseline and further longitudinally on clinical and functioning variables and transition to psychosis. Bullying was more prevalent among CHR individuals than healthy controls. Bullied CHR had a higher prevalence of PTSD and more severe depression and stress at baseline than non-bullied CHR. There was no impact of bullying on clinical and functional variables over time. Bullying was not related to final clinical status or transition to psychosis. However, bullied participants had poorer premorbid functioning and a greater risk of violence. While bullying may not impact the likelihood of CHR individuals to transition to psychosis, it may be a risk factor for development of the at-risk state and may be related to a greater risk of violence. Future studies should consider bullying perpetration among CHR individuals.

Eveningness chronotype preference among individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis

To investigate the association between facial affect recognition (FAR) and type of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in a sample of clinical high risk (CHR) individuals and a matched sample of healthy controls (HCs). In total, 309 CHR individuals and 51 HC were recruited as part of an European Union-funded multicenter study (EU-GEI) and included in this work. During a 2-year follow-up period, 65 CHR participants made a transition to psychosis (CHR-T) and 279 did not (CHR-NT). FAR ability was measured using a computerized version of the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition (DFAR) task. ACEs were measured using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, and the Bullying Questionnaire. Generalized regression models were used to investigate the relationship between ACE and FAR. Logistic regressions were used to investigate the relationship between FAR and psychotic transition. In CHR individuals, having experienced emotional abuse was associated with decreased total and neutral DFAR scores. CHR individuals who had experienced bullying performed better in the total DFAR and in the frightened condition. In HC and CHR, having experienced the death of a parent during childhood was associated with lower DFAR total score and lower neutral DFAR score, respectively. Analyses revealed a modest increase of transition risk with increasing mistakes from happy to angry faces. Adverse experiences in childhood seem to have a significant impact on emotional processing in adult life. This information could be helpful in a therapeutic setting where both difficulties in social interactions and adverse experiences are often addressed.

Recent stressful life events (SLE) are a risk factor for psychosis, but limited research has explored how SLEs affect individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. The current study investigated the longitudinal effects of SLEs on functioning and symptom severity in CHR individuals, where we hypothesized CHR would report more SLEs than healthy controls (HC), and SLEs would be associated with poorer outcomes. The study used longitudinal data from the EU-GEI High Risk study. Data from 331 CHR participants were analyzed to examine the effects of SLEs on changes in functioning, positive and negative symptoms over a 2-year follow-up. We compared the prevalence of SLEs between CHR and HCs, and between CHR who did (CHR-T) and did not (CHR-NT) transition to psychosis. CHR reported 1.44 more SLEs than HC (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in SLEs between CHR-T and CHR-NT at baseline. Recent SLEs were associated with poorer functioning and more severe positive and negative symptoms in CHR individuals (all p < 0.01) but did not reveal a significant interaction with time. CHR individuals who had experienced recent SLEs exhibited poorer functioning and more severe symptoms. However, as the interaction between SLEs and time was not significant, this suggests SLEs did not contribute to a worsening of symptoms and functioning over the study period. SLEs could be a key risk factor to becoming CHR for psychosis, however further work is required to inform when early intervention strategies mitigating against the effects of stress are most effective.

The cerebellum and learning of non-motor associations in individuals at clinical-high risk for psychosis

The current concept of clinical high-risk(CHR) of psychosis relies heavily on “below-threshold” (i.e. attenuated or limited and intermittent) psychotic positive phenomena as predictors of the risk for future progression to “above-threshold” positive symptoms (aka “transition” or “conversion”). Positive symptoms, even at attenuated levels are often treated with antipsychotics (AP) to achieve clinical stabilization and mitigate the psychopathological severity. The goal of this study is to contextually examine clinicians’ decision to prescribe AP, CHR individuals’ decision to take AP and psychosis conversion risk in relation to prodromal symptoms profiles. CHR individuals (n = 600) were recruited and followed up for 2 years between 2016 and 2021. CHR individuals were referred to the participating the naturalistic follow-up study, which research procedure was independent of the routine clinical treatment. Clinical factors from the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) and global assessment of function (GAF) were profiled via exploratory factor analysis (EFA), then the extracted factor structure was used to investigate the relationship of prodromal psychopathology with clinicians’ decisions to AP-prescription, CHR individuals’ decisions to AP-taking and conversion to psychosis. A total of 427(71.2%) CHR individuals were prescribed AP at baseline, 532(88.7%) completed the 2-year follow-up, 377(377/532, 70.9%) were taken AP at least for 2 weeks during the follow-up. EFA identified six factors (Factor-1-Negative symptoms, Factor-2-Global functions, Factor-3-Disorganized communication & behavior, Factor-4-General symptoms, Factor-5-Odd thoughts, and Factor-6-Distorted cognition & perception). Positive symptoms (Factor-5 and 6) and global functions (Factor-2) factors were significant predictors for clinicians’ decisions to AP-prescription and CHR individuals’ decisions to assume AP, whereas negative symptoms (Factor-1) and global functions (Factor-2) factors predicted conversion. While decisions to AP-prescription, decisions to AP-taking were associated to the same factors (positive symptoms and global functions), only one of those was predictive of conversion, i.e. global functions. The other predictor of conversion, i.e. negative symptoms, did not seem to be contemplated both on the clinician and patients’ sides. Overall, the findings indicated that a realignment in the understanding of AP usage is warranted.