Abstract

Advancing age affects the recruitment of task related neural resources thereby changing the efficiency, capacity and use of compensatory processes. With advancing age, brain activity may therefore increase within a region or be reorganized to utilize different brain regions. The different brain regions may be exclusive to old adults or accessible to young and old alike, but non-optimal. Interference during verbal working memory information retention recruits parahippocampal brain regions in young adults similar to brain activity recruited by old adults in the absence of external interference. The current work tests the hypothesis that old adults recruit neural resources to combat increases in age-related intrinsic noise that young adults recruit during high levels of interference during information retention. This experiment administered a verbal delayed item recognition task with low and high levels of an interfering addition task during information maintenance. Despite strong age-related behavioral effects, brain imaging results demonstrated no significant interaction effects between age group and the interference or memory tasks. Significant effects were only found for the interaction between interference level and memory load within the inferior frontal cortex, supplementary motor cortex and posterior supramarginal regions. Results demonstrate that neural resources were shared when facing increasing memory load and interference. The combined cognitive demands resulted in brain activity reaching a neural capacity limit which was similar for both age groups and which brain activation did not increase above. Despite significant behavioral differences the neural capacity limited the detection of age group differences in brain activity.

Highlights

  • With advancing age, there comes a multitude of neural and cognitive changes

  • All main effects for Neural capacity limits the response to increasing memory load and interference accuracy and response time were significant

  • Results from the brain imaging data suggest that memory load and interference pushed neural activation levels up to their neural capacity limits for both age groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There comes a multitude of neural and cognitive changes. Current theories of cognitive aging suggest the existence of age-related declines in neural efficiency, neural capacity and neural compensation [1]. It was hypothesized that decreased integrity of the neural resources within the precentral gyrus required the older adults to alter their strategy, resulting in the observed parahippocampal brain activation This speculation is supported by the report by Sakai et al [11] that interference with information maintenance in young adults results in continual reactivation of the memory trace via activation within the parahippocampal gyrus [11]. Sakai et al [12] observed activation in the prefrontal cortex that was task related but did not differentiate based on levels of interference [12] These results in young adults suggest that our previous finding in old adults may reflect a selection process of compensatory resources. We predicted that increasing memory load would induce the use of additional neural resources within the prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe in old adults and would be comparable to the neural resources that young adults employ when faced with explicit interference with information maintenance [13]

Participants
Summary of behavioral results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.