Abstract

This research examines artist networks created by shared museum exhibition. While previous research on artistic careers assesses self-cultivated networks, historical recognition may be further influenced by connections created by important others, such as museum curators and art historians. I argue when museum exhibitions show artists together, curators are creating symbolic associations between artists that signal the artist’s import and contextualization within his or her peer group. These exhibition-created associations, in turn, influence historians who must choose a small selection of artists to exemplify a historical cohort. The research tests this idea through a cohort of 125 artists’ exhibition networks in the Museum of Modern Art, New York, from 1929 to 1968 (996 exhibitions). Individual network variables, such as number and quality of connections, are examined for impact on an artist’s recognition in current art history textbooks (2012-2014). Results indicate certain connections created by exhibition have a positive effect on historical recognition, even when controlling for individual accomplishments of the artist (such as solo exhibitions). Artists connected with prestigious artists through “strong symbolic ties” (i.e., repeated exhibition) tend to garner the most historical recognition, suggesting robust associations with historical peers may signify an artist’s exemplary status within his or her cohort, and consequent “good fit” into the historical narrative.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAssociations between artists both group them together, such as an artistic movement, style, or school, and relate them with former and future groups (Becker, 1984; Gilmore, 1988; Giuffre, 2001)

  • This study examines the importance of curator-created connections by testing if exhibition networks between artists increase the likelihood of retrospective consecration

  • While curators choose which artists to extol via exhibition, they are choosing networks of artists to exhibit together

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Associations between artists both group them together, such as an artistic movement, style, or school, and relate them with former and future groups (Becker, 1984; Gilmore, 1988; Giuffre, 2001). Examples of this type of connective history abound. Consider the legendary “Cubism and Abstract Art Graph” by Museum of Modern Art’s (MoMA) founding director Alfred Barr or Sarah Fanelli’s “Artist Timeline” formerly installed on the walls of London’s Tate Modern Both examples visually link artists to structure and sequence modern art’s historical movement. Curator-created connections directly influence the extent to which an artist is recognized in the art historical canon

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.