Abstract

difficult political choices for local officials who must respond to neighborhoods competing for scarce resources. The experience of Rochester, New York, the state's third largest city, closely parallels the national experience-shifts away from renewal and clearance activities to conservation and rehabilitation of marginal urban neighborhoods. Over the first six years of the CDBG program, Rochester officials changed from a general, inclusive approach to neighborhood conservation to a more targeted approach. These choices were shaped in response to local economic, demographic and political factors, including a well-organized network of neighborhood organizations. The article concludes that the Rochester experience led to strengthened relationships between neighborhood associations and city hall, but evidence of stabilization and revitalization in assisted city neighborhoods is inconclusive.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.