Abstract
BackgroundNebulised dornase alfa is used off-label in critically ill patients. We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline on patient-important outcome measures in adult critically ill patients.MethodsWe performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) using the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Eligible trials were randomised clinical trials comparing nebulised dornase alfa with placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline. The predefined outcome measures were all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and adverse events. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by conventional cumulative meta-analysis, and the robustness of the primary estimate was assessed by TSA.ResultsTwo trials (n = 63) were included; both were judged to have high risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality (random effects model RR (95 % CI) 0.73 (0.09–5.77); P = 0.24; I2 = 30 %). TSA could not be conducted because less than 1 % of the required information size had been accrued. None of the two trials reported adequate and detailed data on any of the secondary outcome measures.ConclusionsWe found very low quantity and quality of evidence for use of nebulised dornase alfa in adult critically ill patients in this systematic review with meta-analysis.Systematic review registrationThe International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), no. CRD442015016047.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0142-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Nebulised dornase alfa is used off-label in critically ill patients
In a recent review, it was concluded that there is insufficient evidence for the Claudius et al Systematic Reviews (2015) 4:153 efficacy of dornase alfa use in pediatric patients with nonCF pulmonary atelectasis [7]
This systematic review is based on the methodology recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration [8], and the manuscript has been prepared according to the PRISMA statement (Additional file 1) [9]
Summary
We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of nebulised dornase alfa versus placebo, no prophylaxis, or hypertonic saline on patient-important outcome measures in adult critically ill patients. Dornase alfa (Pulmozyme) is a nebulised recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) approved and used in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) [1]. It is a 260-amino acid glycoprotein with 2.5 mg of active drug for nebulization once or twice daily. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of dornase alfa versus placebo or hypertonic saline on patient-important outcome measures in adult critically ill patients. We hypothesized that there is very little evidence supporting off-label use of dornase alfa in adult critically ill patients
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have