Abstract
Ophthalmic and Physiological OpticsVolume 43, Issue 4 p. 935-936 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Near work, light levels and dioptric profile – Which factor dominates and influences the short-term changes in axial length? Sayantan Biswas, Corresponding Author Sayantan Biswas [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-0365 School of Optometry, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Investigation (lead), Methodology (lead), Validation (lead), Writing - original draft (lead), Writing - review & editing (lead)Search for more papers by this author Sayantan Biswas, Corresponding Author Sayantan Biswas [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-0365 School of Optometry, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Investigation (lead), Methodology (lead), Validation (lead), Writing - original draft (lead), Writing - review & editing (lead)Search for more papers by this author First published: 03 May 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13152Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Maldoddi R, Thakur S, Verkicharla PK. Near work, light levels and dioptric profile – which factor dominates and influences the short-term changes in axial length? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023; 43: 426– 34. 2Ghosh A, Collins MJ, Read SA, Davis BA, Chatterjee P. Axial elongation associated with biomechanical factors during near work. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91: 322– 9. 3Read SA, Collins MJ, Iskander DR. Diurnal variation of axial length, intraocular pressure, and anterior eye biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 2911– 8. 4Uzun F, Aslan MG, Öter K, Kaim M. The acute effects of single cup of coffee on ocular biometric parameters in healthy subjects. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019; 31: 394– 8. 5Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variations in axial length, choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure, and ocular biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 5121– 9. 6Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2003; 80: 320– 4. 7Harley SK, Sliney DH. Pupil size in outdoor environments. Health Phys. 2018; 115: 354– 9. 8Muralidharan AR, Lança C, Biswas S, Barathi VA, Wan Yu Shermaine L, Seang-Mei S, et al. Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021; 13:25158414211059246. https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414211059246 9Biswas S, Biswas P. Relationship between diurnal variation in intraocular pressure and central corneal power. Optom Vis Sci. 2023; 100: 96– 104. Volume43, Issue4July 2023Pages 935-936 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
