Abstract
Local rural communities challenge due to regional disparities on conditions and features of economic, infrastructural, social development etc. Most rural communities are strengthened by natural and environmental bases for economic development compared to urban areas. But during the last two decades they face the global challenge – climate change, which takes a risk of socio-economic system (SES), based on natural resources use. Agriculture and natural-based activities are the most vulnerable systems to climate change. This study aims to test the possibilities for Ukrainian local rural communities to adapt their SES, which are based mainly on natural resources use, toward the building of more resilient to climate change systems. Here, we develop the framework for assessment of vulnerability of community’ SES to climate change, using the integrated indicator-based approach. We estimate the Vulnerability Index for six rural communities, describing the integrated level and by subsystems level of vulnerability. Our assessment confirms the high vulnerability of agriculture and natural ecosystem to climate change. It is a crucial challenge for further socio-economic development of the rural SES with the monofunctional economy which is based on natural resources use. In addition, the problem is exacerbated by the high vulnerability of the social system and infrastructure for most studied communities. Understanding the vulnerable subsystems of community’ SES ensure timely response and the development of concrete policy actions at the community and state levels. In this study we substantiate the hotlist of actions for the most vulnerable subsystems.
Highlights
We argue that the ecological component affects the formation of the living space of rural residents
The last is quite important in terms of the objective of this study - assessing the impact of climate change, which have different effects depending on the zone [4]
Our study reveals the high vulnerability of the social subsystem for almost all investigated UTCs, which ranges from 0.60 to 0.72
Summary
We argue that the ecological component affects the formation of the living space of rural residents. There are at least two most important aspects of such an impact in rural areas as follows: First, the general climate changes affect the characteristics of the rural living space due to extreme weather events, changes in temperature and patterns of precipitation and so on. It is an effect of the large corporate farming. Corporate farming is more unsustainable comparing with small individual farms in terms of balancing the major components of sustainable development as economic, social and ecological
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
