Abstract

Nancy Beck Young is not the first historian to recognize the 1964 presidential election as a watershed in the history of modern American politics. The contest between Barry Goldwater and Lyndon Johnson has been central to just about every study of partisan realignment, liberalism, or modern conservatism published during the past three decades. Goldwater’s status as a prophet of the New Right, despite the irony of his massive rejection at the polls in 1964, is well known and well chronicled. At the same time, scholars (and a host of liberal partisans) have long contemplated the tragic ironies of Johnson’s tenure in the White House: millions of voters rejected the conservative Goldwater in 1964, favoring instead Johnson’s vision for a “Great Society,” not to mention what many assumed was a safer, less reckless option for stable world leadership. Within a few years, however, Johnson’s untenable commitment to the mistake of the...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.