Abstract
In the present study the numerical modelling aspects of unsteady flow in simple and compound channels are examined through the application to a laboratory data set of the simple hydrologic routing method Muskingum and the unsteady flow dynamic routing models EXTRAN and ONE-D. Model simulations were compared and evaluated by applying various statistical measures to determine the degree of goodness-of-fit between simulated and observed hydrographs. In terms of overall performance, the Muskingum method proved to be a simple and reliable method avoiding complicated mathematical and numerical computations for the cases considered.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
