Muscle contraction: A new interpretation of the transient behaviour of muscle

Abstract

Piazzesi et al. [G. Piazzesi, L. Lucii, V. Lombardi, J. Physiol. 545 (2002) 145–151] made a study on the muscle transients due to step changes in force using improved time resolution and recorded filament movement and shortening velocities in the four phases. They point to Phase 2 and to Phase 4 (working muscle) and claim that their results do not contradict the swinging-cross-bridge (SCB) model which has a much-quoted constant power stroke of about 150 Å (their value of 70 Å was smaller). Siding with the SCB model, they nevertheless record that the power stroke decreases with load. We are pleased with this experimental result as it conforms to our theory, published in 1996, of an impulsive model with a much smaller step-size distance z (≈20 Å). Using their data we obtain precise interval times and estimates of filament movement in Phase 2 and in working muscle. Our first result is that the time frames (interval times) for Phase 2 are the same as in working muscle. Moreover, we demonstrate that the authors’ data verify the correctness of our calculated z values. There are eight active ATP events in Phase 2 in time frame t compared to one in working muscle in the same time frame t. This gives, for the first time, precise numbers for contractile events. We show that the SCB model is incorrect and our analysis supports the impulsive model with a much smaller filament (zero-load) motion, ≈20 Å per ATP split.