Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Functional tricuspid regurgitation is a common disease that significantly impairs survival and quality of life. The role of echocardiographic right ventricular (RV) function parameters to detect patients with worse prognosis that may benefit from invasive treatment is still under debate. Methods 121 consecutive patients with grade III and IV functional tricuspid regurgitation were evaluated. RV function parameters and clinical variables were assessed at baseline, and then patients were prospectively followed-up. The primary endpoint was the combination of death or heart failure (HF) admissions. Comparison of imaging parameters was done using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was preformed to establish independent predictors of outcomes. Results Median follow up was 27.3 months. 73.6% of the patients were female, and mean age was 80.4 years. 63.6% were grade IV tricuspid regurgitation. In the univariate analysis using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), RV-free wall strain (RVS, AUC = 0.633) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, AUC = 0.605) were the best predictors of death and HF admissions, showing better diagnostic performance than tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and tricuspid S’ (p < 0.001 for each comparison) (graph 1A). In the multivariate analysis including either clinical and echocardiographic variables, independent predictors of death and HF admissions were Age (OR 1.07, p = 0.029), RVS>-16 (OR 5.0, p = 0.001), Diabetes mellitus (OR 3.0, p = 0.011), eGFR (ml/min, OR 0.96, p = 0.001) and Hemoglobin (g/dL, OR = 0.74, p = 0.048) (table 1). The model including these variables was superior than RVS and PASP alone (AUC 0.884, p < 0.001) (graph 1B), showing high sensitivity (78.8%) and moderate specificity (67.3%). Conclusions In patients with significant functional tricuspid regurgitation, RVS and PASP show the best performance for the detection of death and HF admissions. A multivariate model including age, diabetes, eGFR, hemoglobin and RVS was superior than the individual imaging parameters. Table 1 Variable OR 95% CI P value Age (years) 1.07 1.01-1.13 0.029 Diabetes Mellitus 3.00 1.29-7.00 0.011 RV free wall strain >-16 5.01 1.87-13.4 0.001 Hemoglobin (d/dL) 0.74 0.55-1.00 0.048 eGFR (ml/min) 0.96 0.94-0.98 0.001 OR odds ratio. CI: confidence interval. eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI formula). Abstract Figure. Graph 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.