Abstract
It has been acknowledged that chemistry learning involves macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations that should be comprehended by both students and teachers. Since very little research was geared toward investigating high school teachers’ understanding and practices of multiple representations in chemistry learning in Indonesia, this study was carried out to explore such knowledge gap. The method used was descriptive quantitative. Seventy-five chemistry teachers in East Java province participated in this study. They were surveyed using a validated questionnaire asking their understanding of multiple representations. The findings suggest that 49.33% of the participants do not know multiple representations, although, in fact, they practiced these representations in the classroom and employed media that explain chemistry macroscopically, sub-microscopically, and symbolically in learning. Chemistry teachers involved more macroscopic and symbolic representations in learning rather than submicroscopic. Therefore, there is a mismatch between teachers’ understanding and classroom practices with regard to the enactment of multiple representations in chemistry learning.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Representations In Learning
Chemistry Learning
Multiple Representations
Symbolic Representations
Macroscopic Representations
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Jan 1, 2021
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Mar 1, 2021
Jan 1, 2020
Learning and Instruction
Dec 1, 2018
Pelita Eksakta
Mar 31, 2022
Jan 28, 2021
Jan 1, 2023
Mar 30, 2020
Oct 15, 2019
Mar 2, 2021
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Jan 1, 2015