Abstract

Disasters are events that exceed a society’s ability to use its own resources, resulting in physical, economic, social, and environmental losses, and serious disruption to community functioning. A risk- and community-based approach to integrated disaster management is a concept that has become increasingly important in recent years. It is also very important for decision-makers to make effective decisions at each stage of emergency and disaster management, where there are many criteria. Therefore, decision-makers should make the best decision not based on their experience and intuition, but using analytical and quantitative tools. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques in emergency and disaster management. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. Accordingly, 199 articles were included in the study. The results showed that MCDA techniques have gained importance in emergency and disaster management, especially in 2016. Moreover, they are mainly used in the mitigation and preparedness phases of emergencies and disasters. The importance of MCDA methods in developing risk-reduction strategies and building disaster-resilient cities and societies has been increasingly recognized in recent years.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.