Abstract

Forest management planning is a challenge due to the diverse criteria that need to be considered in the underlying decision-making process. This challenge becomes more complex in joint collaborative management areas (ZIF) because the decision now may involve numerous actors with diverse interests, preferences, and goals. In this research, we present an approach to identifying and quantifying the most relevant criteria that actors consider in a forest management planning process in a ZIF context, including quantifying the performance of seven alternative stand-level forest management models (FMM). Specifically, we developed a combined multicriteria decision analysis and group decision-making process by (a) building a cognitive map with the actors to identify the criteria and sub-criteria; (b) structuring the decision tree; (c) structuring a questionnaire to elicit the importance of criteria and sub-criteria in a pairwise comparison process, and to evaluate the FMM alternatives; and (d) applying a Delphi survey to gather actors’ preferences. We report results from an application to a case study area, ZIF of Vale do Sousa, in North-Western Portugal. Actors assigned the highest importance to the criteria income (56.8% of all actors) and risks (21.6% of all actors) and the lowest to cultural services (27.0% of all actors). Actors agreed on their preferences for the sub-criteria of income (diversification of income sources), risks (wildfires) and cultural services (leisure and recreation activities). However, there was a poor agreement among actors on the sub-criteria of the wood demand and biodiversity criteria. For 27.0% of all actors the FMM with the highest performance was the pedunculate oak and for 43.2% of all actors the eucalypt FMM was the least preferable alternative. The findings indicate that this approach can support ZIF managers in enhancing forest management planning by improving its utility for actors and facilitating its implementation.

Highlights

  • Contemporary planning for sustainable management of forest resources is a very complex problem, mainly due to the multiplicity of wide-ranging criteria involved in the underlying decision-making process (e.g., [1,2,3]).Forest management needs to consider additional challenges such as climate change, dynamics of global markets, and societal demand

  • It indicates a variation in Analyzing the intra-group differences, we found that 10 out of 15 actors from market agents and four out of six actors from public administration agreed to provide the highest weight to the income criterion, while five out of 15 actors from market agents and two out of six actors from public administration agreed to assign the highest weight to the risks’

  • Regarding the inter-group analysis (Figure 8b), based on the consensus convergence algorithm, we found that the income criterion was assigned the highest weight by public administration (0.405), market agents (0.400), and forest owners (0.327)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contemporary planning for sustainable management of forest resources is a very complex problem, mainly due to the multiplicity of wide-ranging criteria involved in the underlying decision-making process (e.g., income, soil erosion, wildfire risk) (e.g., [1,2,3]). Forest management needs to consider additional challenges such as climate change, dynamics of global markets, and societal demand. All such decision problems are inherently multicriteria in nature [1,4]. Traditional decision-making approaches to stand-level forest management in North-Western. Innovative methods are needed for forest management decision-making in ZIF

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.