Abstract
We compared the practice of four orthopaedic consultants as regards the use of MRI and arthroscopy to diagnose problems of the knee. In one year 324 arthroscopies and 66 MR scans were performed for this purpose. We found that MRI is a reliable and cheaper alternative to 'diagnostic arthroscopy'. We consider that patients with definite clinical signs merit an early 'therapeutic arthroscopy', but that all other knees should be investigated by MRI. This policy spares patients from unnecessary and expensive surgery. Arthroscopy for diagnostic purposes should be used only with a specific purpose. Modern MRI can and should replace "having a look".
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
