Abstract

Following amputation, individuals ubiquitously report experiencing lingering sensations of their missing limb. While phantom sensations can be innocuous, they are often manifested as painful. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is notorious for being difficult to monitor and treat. A major challenge in PLP management is the difficulty in assessing PLP symptoms, given the physical absence of the affected body part. Here, we offer a means of quantifying chronic PLP by harnessing the known ability of amputees to voluntarily move their phantom limbs. Upper-limb amputees suffering from chronic PLP performed a simple finger-tapping task with their phantom hand. We confirm that amputees suffering from worse chronic PLP had worse motor control over their phantom hand. We further demonstrate that task performance was consistent over weeks and did not relate to transient PLP or non-painful phantom sensations. Finally, we explore the neural basis of these behavioural correlates of PLP. Using neuroimaging, we reveal that slower phantom hand movements were coupled with stronger activity in the primary sensorimotor phantom hand cortex, previously shown to associate with chronic PLP. By demonstrating a specific link between phantom hand motor control and chronic PLP, our findings open up new avenues for PLP management and improvement of existing PLP treatments.

Highlights

  • Following arm amputation individuals generally perceive vivid sensations of the amputated limb as if it is still present, with varying ability to voluntarily move this phantom hand

  • We focus on correlations between chronic Phantom limb pain (PLP), phantom hand movement response times and activity in the primary sensorimotor phantom hand cortex

  • We examined the links between phantom hand movement response times and other measurements relating to chronic PLP, such as chronic non-painful phantom limb sensations and transient PLP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Following arm amputation individuals generally perceive vivid sensations of the amputated limb as if it is still present, with varying ability to voluntarily move this phantom hand. The overarching objective of these behavioural therapies is to relieve PLP by improving the ability to move the phantom limb [e.g., mirror therapy (Chan et al, 2007; Rothgangel Stefan, Braun, Beurskens, Seitz, & Wade, 2011) and graded motor imagery (Moseley, 2006; Thieme, Morkisch, Rietz, Dohle, & Borgetto, 2016)]. The assumption behind these therapies is that increased motor control (or motor imagery) over the phantom hand would cause PLP relief. Systematic evidence for the role of phantom hand motor control in predicting (let alone modulating) PLP is lacking

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.