Motivations and challenges of adult women learners pursuing elementary education in Philippine higher education

Social justice is a fundamental concern for ideal social structure and human rights. To develop social order and philosophical discourses, higher education is one of the holistic approaches to educating it. It elevates the level of idealized modern state formation among students. The present study was designed to examine the contexts of students about practices and malpractices of social justice in higher education. The quantitative approach was adopted to gather the data from 630 university graduates. All the data were gathered through a self-made questionnaire. The findings of the study explained that the participants were not satisfied with practices of social justice in higher education. Most of the participants expressed malpractices of social norms.Especially female students claimed their injustice experiences in higher education. The researcher recommended bold recommendations to uphold the social justice in higher education departments

The aim of this article is to suggest a better—theoretically and empirically grounded—understanding of the complex character of social justice in higher education. Theoretically, this article conceptualises social justice in higher education as mediating participation in, completion of and outcomes from higher education. It introduces the concept of composite capability for achieving higher education that captures capabilities to participate in, complete and gain outcomes from higher education. This study also develops a methodology for building an empirically based classification of countries regarding social justice in participation in higher education, taking into account the assessed inequality in students’ pathways to higher education as well as inequality in their social conditions, associated with students’ social origin. In so doing, it develops three indices: the index of inequalities in students’ pathways, the index of inequalities in students’ social conditions and the index of participation in higher education. Using microdata from the EUROSTUDENT VII survey (2019–2021) for 12 European countries, it applies the developed methodology to classify countries, for which data are available, by the degree of fairness in participation in higher education. This study’s results demonstrate the social embeddedness of social justice in higher education in different economic and political contexts.

Berila, B. (2016). Integrating mindfulness into anti-oppression pedagogy: Social justice in higher education. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Frances Group. Pages: 181. Price: 45.99 USD. (paper).Beth Berila thoughtfully illuminates the intersection between the practice of mindfulness and social justice education in her book, Integrating Mindfulness into Anti-Oppression Pedagogy. The subtitle of her book, Social Justice in Higher Education, highlights the intended audience for her writing. Berila expresses the purpose in writing her book as desire to help us interrupt oppression its roots in our bodies, our hearts, and our minds (p. x). In speaking to the manner in which mindfulness practices can broaden student perspectives in courses that deal with diversity, she reveals the complex ways in which student experiences shape learning and understanding.Demystifying the status quo of power relations and uncovering the ways in which these relationships work to sustain oppression is the basis for anti-oppression pedagogy. Contemplative practices encourage an embodied self-awareness and understanding. In merging the two, Berila proposes a mindful anti-oppression pedagogy that promotes an embodied social justice understanding. As an instructor who has taught courses with social justice themes, I am always interested in the experiences of my students and the responses they have to course material, but I had not considered how these experiences might be deeply held in their bodies. Berila encourages all instructors engaged in social justice education to attend to the ways in which classroom learning experiences impact students in a physical sense. Her book addresses these themes by critically framing mindful anti-oppression pedagogy and suggesting possible learning experiences for instructors of social justice education.Each chapter begins with a thorough analysis and discussion on how mindfulness can be linked to and complement anti-oppression pedagogy. These sections are carefully structured and offer a theoretical framework for thinking about mindfulness practices in social justice education. This theoretical grounding pulls the reader into Berila's central argument: that an integration of mindfulness practices with anti-oppression pedagogy will lead to a deeper understanding of social justice issues and self reflection. Social justice education is a process. The intersectionality of identity, power, privilege and oppression reminds us that structural forces underpin inequities in our society. But social justice work has to also happen at the level of the individual, as we unlearn prejudicial ideologies and oppressive ways of being (p.173). Berila describes the ways in which diversity and difference are embodied by students in their experiences, values, beliefs, and identities within communities. Untangling students' behaviours and beliefs their core is the purpose for her compassionate use of mindfulness practices in her classroom.In Chapter 1, Berila presents an anti-oppression pedagogy framework and introduces us to the idea of mindfulness and its usefulness for engaging students. This chapter allows readers to situate themselves in the context of social justice education. Critical reflection is usually a part of social justice courses, but mindfulness allows for a focus on not only what students are thinking, but on what they are feeling.Contemplative practices enable students to cultivate emotional intelligence, l e a r n to sit with difficult emotions, recognize deeply entrenched narratives they use to interpret the world, cultivate compassion for other people, and become more intentional about how they respond in any given moment. (p. 15)We are invited to move beyond a teaching style that engages only the cognitive abilities of our students, to incorporating practices that allow them to consider issues more deeply and from multiple perspectives. The ideas introduced in this chapter are developed and explored as themes in the chapters that follow. …

The latest volume in the Core Concepts in Higher Education series explores the complexity of law in higher education and both the limits and opportunities of how law can promote inclusivity and access on campus. Through a historical and legal framework, this volume discusses undergraduate students' histories of inclusion and struggles for social justice in higher education by race, sex, social class, dis/ability, and sexual orientation. Bridging research, theory, and practice, Law and Social Justice in Higher Education encourages future and current higher education and student affairs practitioners to consider how they can collaborate to further a just society. Special features: Discussion of case law illustrates the reach and limits of law and where higher education professionals can continue to push for social justice. Accessible to non-lawyers, chapters highlight key legal terms and key concepts to guide readers at the beginning of each chapter. End-of-chapter questions provide prompts for discussion and encourage student interactivity.

A familiar discourse about higher education and social change today relates to higher education’s socio-economic role within knowledge societies in a globalizing world. This paper addresses how issues of social justice feature in such discourses; whether social justice in higher education has been appropriated into a neo-liberal strategy for growing competitive economies; and whether it is possible to deploy an instrument of new public management for advancing the purposes of social justice in higher education. The paper reflects on some of the normative, policy and strategic ambiguities in the notion of social justice as currently invoked in higher education and social change discourses.

In this study we discuss various issues like that of the formulation of principles of impact of higher education policy. Over the past twenty years there is a global set of meeting addresses on learning around the globe, differently done by different nations. Higher education initially had remained constant throughout centuries however the system is currently undergoing a change, evaluative as it is as, this article starts off by including multi-disciplinary programs as its core. Higher education administration and the administrators are required to be socially just, must be concerned about equity and must lead the students be better human beings. The articles emphasises of the requirement of social justice and a leadership structure. The integration of equity, social justice, good conscience and ethics must be reflected in professional practice. The objective of this article is to understand the current numerous perspectives on the developments and trends around higher education around the globe. It is in particular aimed that social justice forms a crucial part of higher education. There are various approaches of higher education institutions around the world to admit students such as the classical merit/elite door and financial interest door. The study has been gathered upon consultation of various relevant documents and literature to understand the problem, the research done is analytical and not empirical. The article argues that it is a perquisite of higher educational institutes to uphold social responsiveness by taking in social justice. Over and above that it is also pertinent to raise consciousness about social justice and social responsiveness of higher educational institute’s stakeholders and by bookkeeping different perspectives contributing to engineer just and fair society. The study further discusses various related issues of social justice in higher education’s and different approaches and themes have been incorporated for a better study and understanding.

In this article, two Black women scholars in higher education share a conversation with our distinguished senior colleague, Yvonna Lincoln, a pioneering scholar of qualitative research methodology about what we have learned from her, and more specifically, how this research paradigm has been used to advance racial equity and social justice in higher education. The readers will learn, through her lens, about issues that emerged over the years and what she envisions for the future of higher education and qualitative research. This article presents implications for higher education, including faculty, students, and administrators working in higher education institutions.

Students with disabilities face myriad barriers and hurdles to success in higher education settings. Institutions in developing nations often lack the necessary resources to provide accessible instruction, and the absence of clearly defined policies further impedes upholding the educational rights of such a special population. The purpose of this study was to examine how undergraduate students with visual impairments in Bangladesh felt about their experiences related to social justice and challenges in learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. A convenience sample of 133 students was recruited from two public universities. The authors developed two instruments, namely, the Social Justice Experiences in Higher Education Scale and the Social Justice Challenges in Higher Education Scale, to measure how the participants felt. The results showed that most of the participants experienced some sort of difficulty in receiving social justice in higher education. However, the differences in the group mean score on social justice experiences and challenges in higher education were not statistically significant between the male and female participants of this study. The outcomes of the study and their implications for rehabilitation research and practice have also been addressed in this paper.

(1) Background: Uneven access to the experience of extra-classroom, student–faculty pedagogical partnerships, as well as the relatively small number of students who can participate in this work, raise equity concerns. Calls to scale up such partnership opportunities often focus on expanding the number and kind of existing partnership projects in a given context, which requires resources and infrastructure that many institutions do not have. (2) Method: We took a students-as-co-researchers approach to a three-phase action-research project to test our hypothesis that (a) assessing the benefits of pedagogical partnership, (b) conceptualizing a new approach to fostering those benefits, and (c) piloting that approach could inform efforts at our own and other institutions to pursue social-justice goals in higher education. (3) Findings: Both our review of the wider literature and our analysis of our own partnership program’s student and faculty participant perspectives affirmed that participating in extra-classroom, student–faculty pedagogical partnerships fosters in students personal learning-related capacities, deepens understanding of other learners and of teachers, and builds career-ready competencies. The new scaling-up approach to fostering these benefits that we conceptualized and have begun to pilot has the potential to be more inclusive, equitable, and feasible than replicating existing extra-classroom pedagogical partnership models. (4) Conclusions: Creating such opportunities for students to develop educational, interpersonal, and professional capacities and competencies can contribute to equity and social justice in higher education.

This study chronicles important contributions made by Miguel A. Nevárez, an Hispanic model for social justice in higher education. An analysis of archival records and interviews shows how Nevárez brought about greater opportunities for South Texas students by institutionalizing campus initiatives and by playing a role in the birth of the South Texas Border Initiative and the expansion of the University of Texas System. By chronicling Nevárez’s actions, this study fills a gap in the historical record.

Teaching for social justice in higher education: Reflexive and critical auto-ethnographic narratives of hope, resilience, and change

This paper will focus on an applied research initiative1 we are currently engaged in, which brings together academics (both from conventional institutions – the university, the research centers and undergraduate colleges – and from ‘new and innovative institutional structures’) with policy-makers and grant-making organizations. The initiative has to do with the entire field of higher education (India having one of the biggest higher education systems in the world), but interestingly it was incubated by the Center for the Study of Culture and Society (CSCS). The painstaking process of the gestation of collaborative interdisciplinary themes/fields of research/teaching and the labor of negotiation with policy-makers and grantees in the field of higher education by a Cultural Studies centre is thus the focus of this paper. Called the Higher Education Cell, an important aspect of the initiative's genealogy is that it is based on (a) a critique of the existing disciplines and an attention to the birthing of ‘new thematic/field specifics’ as also (b) a critique of the research undertaken in mainstream institutions and an attention to new research methodologies. The Higher Education Cell is at present focusing on four major functions through which it plans to engage with the higher education sector. These functions are (i) Incubation of Research Initiatives, (ii) Institutional Collaborations, (iii) Documentation and Archiving, and (iv) Grant Development. The research initiatives, which include Globalization and Higher Education, General Education in Comparative Perspective, Regional Language Resources, and Social Justice in Higher Education, have been conceived through collaborations with a range of higher education institutions. The wider context of the labor of negotiation is one where (1) new institutional structures are being experimented with, resulting in the emergence of ‘institutions with a difference’, (2) new interdisciplinary courseware or new themes/fields of research/teaching are being created (such as film-media studies, gender-sexuality-Dalit studies, migration studies, environment studies) and (3) new research and pedagogic methodologies are being given shape.

Globalization and Social Justice in Higher Education

Student protest actions across South Africa’s twenty six universities has somewhat become a predictable event due to its sustained occurrence over the last decade, engendering a stereotypical attitude to protesting students and university education. Coupled with massification, the South African higher education milieu projects an inefficient tertiary systems raising questions of quality and worthiness of its graduates. In this chapter I argue that, while systemically the current higher education milieu projects stereotypical conceptions about different student groupings leading to a normalising discourse, taking a humanistic perspective opens up a possibility discourse within which higher education studies have provided life changing opportunity for students. Drawing from an institutional case study I explore a humanistic perspective that prioritises understanding people’s subjectivity, and asks ‘, ‘what is it like to be this person?’ in making sense of the multiple forces and factors that students have to negotiate in accessing and sustaining their studying in a higher education institution. Using what Higgs (Dialogue and Universalism 2:13–22, 2011) describes as the ‘construction of plurality, pragmatism and judiciousness’ as an alternate discourse I take this approach to go beyond universal reasoning to individual reasoning that is textured, layered and discursive to illuminate hope and joy in students realised through their higher education studies.

This article is a reflection on the use of object memory in creating a collaborative arts-based narrative that explores educator experiences with transformation in higher education. The collaborative arts-based narrative that I present here emerged from my doctoral thesis in which I collaborated with participants to explore how our memories and experiences could help us understand and approach issues of social justice in education. In this article, I reflect on the way in which memory objects guided the creation of a collaborative arts-based narrative of educators' autobiographical experiences, educational encounters, and anti-oppressive education. Memory objects are used to explore educator identity, subjectivity, and experience in relation to issues of social change and social justice in higher education. Through this exploration, I hope to highlight the entanglement of context, experience, and the theoretical understandings of social justice and anti-oppressive education. The aim of this article is to reflect on how objects were used to make new connections and exciting discoveries through a collaborative narrative of memories and experiences of educators working towards social change in higher education.