Abstract
Some students of motivational interviewing have found aspects of the technique and/or underlying philosophy problematic. Six such concerns are described: (1) that the technique seems too passive; (2) that it appears to collaborate with the user's denial; (3) that it may take too much time; (4) that it seems to support the status quo; (5) that interviewers who use it appear naive; and (6) that it may be presented as the right thing for all people at all times. Alternative views to these six concerns are offered. These alternative views may allow practitioners to feel more comfortable adding motivational interviewing to their collection of counseling skills for use with individuals who abuse substances.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
