Abstract

Numerous studies of American communities have found that status decentralization tends to be the dominant pattern for larger communities undergoing population growth and geographic expansion. Comparative research by Sjoberg and others indicates, however, that the dominant pattern in preindustrial societies has keen for status to be centralized rather than decentralized in the larger communities. An inverse Burgess zonal model thus appears to apply in preindustrial communities. The purpose of this paper is to test the Sjoberg model of the preindustrial city using census data from Moscow in 1897, a major world city that has not been researched for its implications on the theory of urban structure. Data on estates, literacy, education and occupation indicate a centralized status system. Indexes of that reflect a decentralized pattern are the sex ratio, percent with certain physical defects and emotional disorders, and the rate of divorce. The distributional patterns of the socioeconomic status and disorganization in prerevolutionary Moscow were thus consistent with the Sjoberg model of the preindustrial community.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.