Abstract

Aim. To assess mortality from all causes in patients with past myocardial infarction with elevation of ST segment (STEMI) depending on the type of reperfusion therapy.
 Materials and Methods. Of 1456 patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome with elevation of ST segment, 848 cases were randomly selected for analysis. Acquisition of information of the end point (death from any causes) continued within 18 months. The present data were obtained by 01.10.2020, median of observation was 20.8 [17.4;23.6] months.
 Results. The highest 18-month mortality (42.3%) was seen in the group of patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy. With this, mortality rate for 30 days in the group of thrombolytic therapy (TLT) and in the group without reperfusion did not show any significant differences (20.3% vs 26.2%, р0.05). Hospital, 30-day, 12-month, 18-month mortality from all causes in the group of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) made 8.4, 10.6, 16.6 and 18.3%, respectively, and was significantly lower compared to the group who did not receive reperfusion (19.5, 26.2, 36.2 and 42.3%, respectively, р0,05). The most significant differences in the frequency of the end point were recorded on achievement of 18-month limit: in the group without reperfusion mortality was 42.3%, that was higher (р0.05) compared to the given parameter in the group with TLT (27.1%), PCI (18.3%) and TLT+PCI (13.1%).
 Conclusion. During 18 months of observation, the lowest mortality from all causes was observed in the group with use of pharmacoinvasive approach and primary PCI, the highest mortality was in the group of patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.