Abstract
AbstractIn this study, the specimens of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and blend polymers of LDPE and a random copolymer of ethylene and propylene were prepared by the blowing process and T‐die method. The differences in electrical breakdown properties and morphology between the specimens made by the two different methods were studied. It was found that the specimen made by the T‐die method had a higher electrical breakdown strength than the specimen made by the blowing process, except for the DC breakdown strength in some cases at 30 °C. The morphology of the specimens was investigated by means of the measurements of thermal shrinkage, infrared dichroism, and X‐ray diffraction. The specimen made by the T‐die method has a stronger orientation in both the crystalline and amorphous phases than the specimen made by the blowing process. The difference in morphology is supposed to be correlated with the difference in electrical breakdown properties between the specimens made by the two different methods. It was concluded that the electrical breakdown properties are strongly affected by the orientation of chains in the specimen. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 1741–1748, 2001
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
