Abstract
AbstractIsothermal crystallization and morphology of G‐resin (GPP) and isotactic polypropylene (iPP) samples were investigated and compared using synchrotron small‐ and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering/diffraction (SAXS/WAXD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Two GPP resins (MT12‐s and MT18‐s) are iPP containing a small amount of 1‐butene. All polymers have similar MW and PDI, denoted by V30G, MT12‐s, and MT18‐s with 1‐butene = 0.00, 6.43, and 5.20 wt%, respectively. DSC isothermal crystallization at 130°C showed that the crystallinity of G resins were lower, but the crystallization rate of G resins was faster in the order as MT18‐s ≥ MT12‐s > V30G. Simultaneous synchrotron SAXS/WAXD was employed to determine polymer morphology crystallized from the melt. The electron density correlation function was calculated to estimate the lamellar thickness. The long periods (D) are around 19.0, 25.8, and 25.8 nm for V30G, MT12‐s, and MT18‐s, respectively. The GPP samples have a larger amorphous portion and a higher crystalline thickness (L) but a lower L/D ratio than IPP. The degree of crystallinity by WAXD is also smaller for GPP, that is, MT18‐s (31%) ≈ MT12‐s (31%) < V30G (>50%). In addition to the monoclinic α forms for all the PP samples, the orthorhombic γ forms were found only for MT12‐s and MT18‐s. The crystallization of G‐resins should be nucleated from the transparent filler and are not fully an intrinsic property of the copolymer chains.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.