Abstract
A letter cancellation task was employed to examine whether a prelexical phonological representation is an essential component of the normal reading process. In the cancellation of letter “e” s in the “ed” affix attached to the past tense forms of English regular verbs, there was no evidence that detection performance was influenced by the pronunciation of the target letter. In Experiment I, instructions to remember the content of the text had no effect upon performance, and any effects of instructions to read the text aloud were attributable to a speed-accuracy trade-off. In Experiment II, there was no evidence that articulatory suppression affected the normal reading process. Although aspects of performance in letter cancellation may be contaminated by task-specific scanning strategies, the present findings permit one to conclude that normal reading employs a direct, nonphonological means of lexical access.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.